• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Age Ageing . Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccination and previous infection in older adults during Omicron period: real-world evidence

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Age Ageing


. 2024 Nov 1;53(11):afae251.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae251. Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccination and previous infection in older adults during Omicron period: real-world evidence

Pedro-Pablo España[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Idoia Castillo-Sintes[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Maria J Legarreta[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Amaia Bilbao-González[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Nere Larrea[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Maria Gascon[SUP] 4 5 7 [/SUP], Ane Uranga[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Amaia Artaraz[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Julia Garcia-Asensio[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jose M Quintana[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP]; COVID-Health Basque Country Research Group



Collaborators, Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of booster bivalent vaccines against the Omicron variant, particularly amongst older patients, remains uncertain.
Objective: We sought to compare the relative effectiveness of a fourth dose of vaccine using bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), by comparing patients who had and had not received this dose.
Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death of people aged >60 years with four doses as compared to those with only three doses. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We adjusted by age, sex, nursing-home, comorbidities, primary care setting and previous episodes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. We also investigated the impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection within each cohort, using the same methodology.
Results: The administration of a fourth bivalent mRNA vaccine dose conferred significant additional protection against COVID-19 infection (HR: 0.479; 95% CI: 0.454-0.506), hospitalization (HR: 0.393; 95% CI: 0.348-0.443) and 30-day mortality (HR: 0.234; 95% CI: 0.171-0.318), as compared to individuals who had received only a third monovalent vaccine dose. In both cohorts, a prior history of COVID-19 infection involves lower risk of COVID-infection, hospitalization and death.
Conclusions: During the period of Omicron predominance, receiving a bivalent booster vaccine as a fourth dose, as compared to receiving only three doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, provides significant extra protection against COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality. Antecedents of SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination involves a notable reduction in the above COVID-19 outcomes.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS coronavirus 2 vaccines; hospital admission; mortality; older people; vaccine effectiveness.

 
Back
Top Bottom