• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

AFD - H1N1 in United Kingdom

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
A Yank From Oxford




# 3248


John Oxford, that is.

Who happens to be a virologist of some note, and is the Scientific Director of Retroscreen Virology Ltd. Oxford also serves as a Professor of Virology at St Bartholomew?s and the Royal London Hospital, Queen Mary?s School of Medicine and Dentistry.

He takes great exception today of the `official? numbers of H1N1 infections currently in the UK, and believes the real number is several hundred times larger than is being admitted.

The criteria for testing in the UK is very limited, and there has been much criticism over `artificially low? numbers being reported by the NHS (see H1N1 In Europe: Hiding In Plain Sight?) along with other European nations.

This report from The Independent.



UK swine flu toll is really 30,000, says leading scientist



True extent of the outbreak is claimed to be 300 times worse than government agency admits
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Sunday, 24 May 2009

Thirty thousand people in Britain are likely to have been already infected by swine flu, one of the country's leading authorities has told The Independent on Sunday. This would mean that the virus is 300 times more widespread than the Health Protection Agency (HPA) admits.

The startling estimate by top virologist Professor John Oxford comes as leading scientists are warning that the agency's announcements on the spread of the disease are "meaningless" and hiding its true extent. And it tallies with official estimates made in the United States.

Yet the World Health Organisation (WHO) late last week changed its rules in order to avoid declaring that the flu has become a pandemic after pleas from governments, led by Britain.

Professor Oxford, of Queen Mary, University of London, believes that thousands of people have caught the virus and suffered only the most minor symptoms, or none at all, over the past weeks, as the new strain of H1N1 has spread nationwide ? welcome testimony to the mildness of the epidemic to date.

He also thinks that some 100,000 people will have been infected in the US ? the same number as is being privately estimated by experts at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ? and another 30,000 in Japan, where swine flu was spreading rapidly last week.

This contrasts with the number of officially tested and confirmed cases recorded by the WHO, which now stands at 11,168 in 42 countries on every continent except Africa. So far just 86 deaths have been ascribed to the disease, all of them in North and Central America, including 75 in Mexico.
(Continue . . . )


* * * * * * * * *

If the title of this blog sounds vaguely familiar, it is taken from the 1938 MGM comedy A Yank At Oxford, starring Robert Taylor, Lionel Barrymore, Maureen O'Sullivan and Vivien Leigh.

In `American?, giving someone `a yank? can mean jarring, jolting, or pulling someone up short.

These plays on words amuse me, but I know they must mystify some of my readers from time to time. Sorry about that.
 
Back
Top Bottom