• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Adv Respir Med . Clinical significance of basic laboratory parameters in predicting the use of various methods of oxygen supplementation in COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Adv Respir Med


. 2022 Jan 31.
doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2022.0016. Online ahead of print.
Clinical significance of basic laboratory parameters in predicting the use of various methods of oxygen supplementation in COVID-19


Ewelina Tobiczyk[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hanna Maria Winiarska[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daria Springer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ewa Wysocka[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Szczepan Cofta[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection resulted in significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the results of laboratory tests performed on patients on admission to the hospital between groups of patients requiring and not requiring oxygen supplementation, and to find predictive laboratory indicators for the use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT)/continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP).
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of consecutive patients hospitalised in the Pulmonology Department of the Temporary COVID Hospital in Poznan from February to May 2021. On admission to the department, the patients had a panel of laboratory blood tests.
Results: The study group consisted of 207 patients with a mean age of 59.2 ± 15.0 years of whom 179 (72%) were male. During hospitalisation, oxygen supplementation was required by 87% of patients. Patients requiring oxygen supplementation and/or the use of HFNOT/CPAP/BPAP had lower lymphocyte counts and higher levels of urea, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, troponin, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as well as higher white blood cell and neutrophil counts, The parameter that obtained the highest area under curve value in the receiver operator curve analysis for the necessary use of HFNOT/CPAP/BPAP or CPAP/BPAP was LDH activity.
Conclusions: Among the basic parameters assessed on admission to the temporary hospital, LDH activity turned out to be the most useful for assessing the need for CPAP/BPAP active oxygen therapy. Other parameters that may be helpful for predicting the need for HFNOT/CPAP/BPAP are serum levels of urea, D-dimer and troponin.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP); continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT); laboratory tests.
 
Back
Top Bottom