• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A systematic review of the health economic consequences of quadrivalent influenza vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Jun 14. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1343145. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]A systematic review of the health economic consequences of quadrivalent influenza vaccination.[/h] de Boer PT[SUP]1[/SUP], van Maanen BM[SUP]1[/SUP], Damm O[SUP]2[/SUP], Ultsch B[SUP]3[/SUP], Dolk FCK[SUP]1[/SUP], Cr?pey P[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Pitman R[SUP]6[/SUP], Wilschut JC[SUP]7[/SUP], Postma MJ[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]8,[/SUP][SUP]9[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs) contain antigens derived from an additional influenza type B virus as compared with currently used trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs). This should overcome a potential reduced vaccine protection due to mismatches between TIV and circulating B viruses. In this study, we systematically reviewed the available literature on health economic evaluations of switching from TIV to QIV. Areas Covered: The databases of Medline and Embase were searched systematically to identify health economic evaluations of QIV versus TIV published before September 2016.A total of sixteen studies were included, thirteen cost-effectiveness analyses and three cost-comparisons. Expert commentary: Published evidence on the cost-effectiveness of QIV suggests that switching from TIV to QIV would be a valuable intervention from both the public health and economic viewpoint. However, more research seems mandatory. Our main recommendations for future research include: 1) more extensive use of dynamic models in order to estimate the full impact of QIV on influenza transmission including indirect effects, 2) improved availability of data on disease outcomes and costs related to influenza type B viruses, and 3) more research on immunogenicity of natural influenza infection and vaccination, with emphasis on cross-reactivity between different influenza B viruses and duration of protection.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Economic evaluation; cost-effectiveness; influenza; model; quadrivalent; vaccination; vaccine

PMID: 28613092 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1343145
 
Back
Top Bottom