• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A rural community intervention targeting biomass combustion sources: effects on air quality and reporting of children's respiratory outcomes

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Feb 1. [Epub ahead of print]
A rural community intervention targeting biomass combustion sources: effects on air quality and reporting of children's respiratory outcomes.
Noonan CW, Ward TJ, Navidi W, Sheppard L.
Source

Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Abstract

ObjectiveImprovements in urban air quality are largely driven by controls on industrial and mobile source emissions, but such factors may have limited influence on many rural environments where biomass combustion (eg, wood stoves) serves as the primary source of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)). The authors tracked changes in children's respiratory health during a wood stove intervention in a rural mountain valley community heavily impacted by wood smoke-derived PM(2.5).MethodsCommunity-wide impacts on children's health were assessed by prospectively collecting surveys from parents of school children during four winter periods in Libby, Montana. Generalised estimating equations with a logit link were used to estimate the effect of reduction in ambient PM(2.5) on wheeze prevalence and other reported symptoms and infections.ResultsOver 1100 wood stoves were replaced with new lower emission wood stoves or other heating sources. Ambient PM(2.5) was 27.6% lower in the winters following the changeout programme compared with baseline winters. There was a 26.7% (95% CI 3.0% to 44.6%) reduced odds of reported wheeze for a 5 μg/m(3) decrease in average winter PM(2.5). Lower ambient PM(2.5) was also associated with reduced odds for reported respiratory infections, including cold (25.4% (95% CI 7.6% to 39.7%)), bronchitis (54.6% (95% CI 24.2% to 72.8%)), influenza (52.3% (95% CI 42.5% to 60.5%)) and throat infection (45.1% (95% CI 29.0% to 57.6%)).ConclusionThis wood stove intervention provided a unique opportunity to prospectively observe health benefits resulting from a targeted air pollution reduction strategy in a rural community.

PMID:
22302628
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22302628
 
Back
Top Bottom