• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A retrospective observational analysis of post-pandemic influenza-related outcomes in the United Kingdom, 2010-2014

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Nov 14:0. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1403696. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]A retrospective observational analysis of post-pandemic influenza-related outcomes in the United Kingdom, 2010-2014.[/h] Rajaram S[SUP]1[/SUP], Wiecek W[SUP]2[/SUP], Lawson R[SUP]3[/SUP], Blak B[SUP]4[/SUP], Zhao Y[SUP]5[/SUP], Hackett J[SUP]3[/SUP], Brody R[SUP]3[/SUP], Salimi T[SUP]3[/SUP], Amzal B[SUP]2[/SUP], Patel V[SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] This study set out to evaluate influenza- and respiratory-related illnesses recorded during primary care physician consultations in England following the H1N1 pandemic in 2009 and to enable the development of a dynamic disease model. Data were obtained from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink of primary care records over four influenza seasons (2010-2014). The primary outcome of the study was incidence of influenza- and respiratory-related diagnoses, calculated per practice and by season and age group. Upper respiratory tract infection diagnoses were most frequently recorded (mean seasonal practice level incidence; 3,762 consultations per 100,000 [SD = 1,989]), and influenza-related diagnoses were least frequently recorded across all seasons, except one. Incidence rates for the under 18 population were higher than those for the general population, in particular for upper respiratory tract infection (range of 8,024-9,950 versus 3,228-4,120, respectively) and otitis media diagnoses (2,668-3,652 versus 782-1,057, respectively). For influenza-related diagnoses, the 65+ age group, the 0 to <2 and 2 to <4 groups had a higher risk (risk ratio = 1.33, 1.12 and 1.16, respectively) than other age groups. This study provides valuable insight into the incidence of influenza- and respiratory-related diagnoses in the primary care setting in England, and suggests a higher burden of disease in young children and the elderly. The study also indicates that some influenza illness is likely to be reported under respiratory-related diagnoses, given the low incidence of influenza-related diagnoses in the study.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] CPRD; Influenza; Respiratory disease; United Kingdom; Vaccination

PMID: 29135336 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1403696
 
Back
Top Bottom