• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A National Study of the Impact of Rapid Influenza Testing on Clinical Care in the Emergency Department

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2014 Jun;3(2):112-118. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
A National Study of the Impact of Rapid Influenza Testing on Clinical Care in the Emergency Department.
Blaschke AJ1, Shapiro DJ2, Pavia AT1, Byington CL1, Ampofo K1, Stockmann C3, Hersh AL1.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT) may influence physician decision-making. Single-center studies suggest that influenza diagnosed in association with RIDT reduces ancillary testing and antibiotic prescribing. The extent of RIDT use in US emergency departments (EDs) and their impact on patient management are unknown. We examined the use of RIDT and its effect on influenza management, using a national sample of ED visits.
METHODS:

We performed a retrospective study using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annually administered survey capturing a nationally representative sample of visits to US EDs. We identified patient visits in which RIDT was performed and/or influenza was diagnosed across 3 influenza seasons (2007-2009). Ancillary testing and antibiotic and antiviral prescribing were evaluated for 2 groups of patients in whom RIDT was performed (those given or not given a diagnosis of influenza) and a third group in whom influenza was diagnosed but RIDT was not performed.
RESULTS:

Rapid influenza diagnostic tests were performed during 4.2 million visits. Forty-two percent of influenza diagnoses were made in association with RIDT. For patients diagnosed with influenza, ancillary test ordering was lower (45% vs 53% of visits) and there were fewer antibiotic prescriptions (11% vs 23%), and antiviral use was higher (56% vs 19%) when the diagnosis was made in association with RIDT.
CONCLUSIONS:

Influenza diagnoses made in association with RIDT resulted in fewer tests and antibiotic prescriptions and more frequent use of antivirals. This finding suggests that test results influence physician behavior.
KEYWORDS:

emergency department; influenza; influenza testing; rapid diagnostics; rapid influenza testing

PMID:
24872879
[PubMed]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24872879
 
Back
Top Bottom