• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Discussion: Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) in Wuhan has been working with bats and coronavirus for many years - DNA manipulations, cloning.... - Ja

FOX NEWS FLASH
Published 24 mins ago

Pompeo calls on China to release evidence disproving Wuhan lab leak theory: 'Come on, bring it'
...
While I can?t prove it, every piece of evidence - and you?ve seen scientists today come out saying we need more investigation - points to a leak from this laboratory. That?s all circumstantial to be sure. The people who could clean this up and answer the questions have refused to do. ? If I?m wrong, they could embarrass Mike Pompeo. Come on, bring it. Show the world this didn't come from Wuhan Institute of Virology.
?
They're not gonna do that. They know they covered this up in the same way that Chernobyl was covered up for so long. We saw the same results, millions of people dead.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/pompeo-china-evidence-wuhan-lab-leak-covid
 
Bat out of hell? Covid is global but questions over Wuhan lab leak won?t go away
...
Saikiran Kannan
Singapore
May 18, 2021UPDATED: May 18, 2021 18:41 IST
...
Probable signs of a lab leak?

It is very critical to note that the project 2013FY113500 was under review by China?s ministry of science and technology, with September 30, 2019, being the deadline. During this time, the MoST did a few other things.

Firstly, it released a tender to identify five major novel viral pathogens from wild animals and carry out a biosecurity risk assessment by testing them on small animals.

Secondly, MoST blocked access to the WIV pathogen database.

At the same time, the Wuhan city center for disease control and prevention released an emergency tender to purchase virus detection kits that included 40,500 PCR testing kits. The Wuhan CDC also released tenders to dispose of 2.5 tons of hazardous biochemical waste from their labs.
...
There are now some OSINT-based data obtained that shows mysterious blips in Google search and Wikipedia trends for the terms ?Coronavirus? and ?SARS?, in Hubei province in September 2019.

Eric Haseltine, Ph.D., is a former intelligence officer who started looking at the possibilities of search trends showing up on Google and Wikipedia based on theories that the outbreak first started between September and early October.
...
Google Trends, which displays ?normalised? search traffic for specific queries, localized to specific geographic regions, showed two ?blips? in search interest in China for the terms ?Coronavirus? and ?SARS?, one in Hubei province ( where Wuhan is the capitol) in September 2019 and one in Beijing in October 2019. Because the data are normalised (given as ratios of search to the maximum number of searches for that term), only Google knows the actual raw numbers of searches for any given term, but the normalised data do give an indication of changes in the relative volume of search.
...
https://www.indiatoday.in/coronavir...ak-sars-origin-coronavirus-1803938-2021-05-18
 
I was a little concerned when I saw this was from McNeil as I had taken issue with a very poor article he had written about vaccine escape in the 2009 pandemic - and by the title. However I have read this now and it is an excellent well balanced overview and mercifully, unlike many of the links in this thread, not written to promote an agenda but in search of the truth relating to how this virus transitioned from a bat to a human virus. Highly recommended.
 
https://www.technologyreview.com/20...vid-origin-wuhan-china-lab-biologists-letter/

Top researchers are calling for a real investigation into the origin of covid-19

A group of prominent biologists say there needs to be a ?safe space? for asking whether the coronavirus came out of a lab.

by Rowan Jacobsen

May 13, 2021

REUTERS/Thomas Peter

A group of prominent biologists say there needs to be a ?safe space? for asking whether the coronavirus came out of a lab.

Now, in a letter in the journal Science, 18 prominent biologists?including the world?s foremost coronavirus researcher?are lending their weight to calls for a new investigation of all possible origins of the virus, and calling on China?s laboratories and agencies to ?open their records? to independent analysis.

?We must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data,? the scientists write.
...
The discussion around the lab leak hypothesis has already become highly political. In the US, it has been embraced most loudly by Republican lawmakers and conservative media figures, including Fox News host Tucker Carlson. The resulting polarization has had a chilling effect on scientists, some of whom have been reluctant to express their own concerns, says Relman.

?We felt motivated to say something because science is not living up to what it can be, which is a very fair and rigorous and open effort to gain greater clarity on something,? he says. ?For me, part of the purpose was to create a safe space for other scientists to say something of their own.?...

More from this article:

...
The chief scientist for emerging disease at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Shi Zhengli, said in an email that the letter?s suspicions were misplaced and would damage the world?s ability to respond to pandemics. ?It?s definitely not acceptable,? Shi said of the group?s call to see her lab?s records. "Who can provide an evidence that does not exist?"

?It?s really sad to read this ?Letter? written by these 18 prominent scientists.? Shi wrote in her email. ?The hypothesis of a lab leaking is just based on the expertise of a lab which has long been working on bat coronaviruses which are phylogenetically related to SARS-CoV-2. This kind of claim will definitely damage the reputation and enthusiasm of scientists who are dedicated to work on the novel animal viruses which have potential spillover risk to human populations and eventually weaken the ability of humans to prevent the next pandemic.?
...
The letter echoes some of the concerns of an earlier call for a new investigation published in the Wall Street Journal by a collection of 26 policy analysts and scientists...

But that group consisted largely of outsiders, and the letter was dismissed by some established virologists on the grounds that its signatories lacked appropriate expertise...

No such dismissal will be possible with this new letter, whose signatories include Akiko Iwasaki, a Yale immunologist who has spearheaded the research on the immune system?s response to SARS-CoV-2, and Ralph Baric, the University of North Carolina virologist who is considered the world?s foremost authority on coronaviruses, and who pioneered techniques for genetically manipulating such viruses that became a major aspect of research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The new letter also gains extra gravitas from its publication in Science, one of the world?s most prestigious journals.
...
 
hat tip friend of FluTrackers


Intelligence on Sick Staff at Wuhan Lab Fuels Debate On Covid-19 Origin

Report says researchers went to hospital in November 2019, shortly before confirmed outbreak; Adds to calls for probe of whether virus escaped lab

By
Michael R. Gordon
,
Warren P. Strobel
and
Drew Hinshaw
May 23, 2021 2:57 pm ET


WASHINGTON?Three researchers from China?s Wuhan Institute of Virology became sick enough in November 2019 that they sought hospital care, according to a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report that could add weight to growing calls for a fuller probe of whether the Covid-19 virus may have escaped from the laboratory.

The details of the reporting go beyond a State Department fact sheet, issued during the final days of the Trump administration, which said that several researchers at the lab, a center for the study of coronaviruses and other pathogens, became sick in autumn 2019 ?with symptoms consistent with both Covid-19 and common seasonal illness.?

The disclosure of the number of researchers, the timing of their illnesses and their hospital visits come on the eve of a meeting of the World Health Organization?s decision-making body, which is expected to discuss the next phase of an investigation into Covid-19?s origins.

more...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/intell...b-fuels-debate-on-covid-19-origin-11621796228
 
Source: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-...ute-Virology-November-2019-ill/7161621868451/

China denies three Wuhan lab researchers fell ill in November 2019
By Elizabeth Shim

May 24 (UPI) -- China said Monday a report that three scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology fell ill as early as November 2019, a month before the first known outbreak of COVID-19 from a seafood market, is not true.

The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that according to a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report, researchers were hospitalized in November.
Advertisement

But China said Monday the Journal article is false and international health experts have disproved the claims...
 
Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian's Regular Press Conference on May 24, 2021
...
Bloomberg: There have been media reports over the weekend that three researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology became sick enough that in November 2019 they sought medical care. Does the foreign ministry have a comment on this report? Does it have anything to add to China's previous comments about the origins of the coronavirus? ...

Zhao Lijian: Regarding your first question, the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of sciences has issued a statement on March 23. According to the statement, the Wuhan Institute of Virology had not been exposed to Covid-19 before December 30, 2019, and a "zero-infection" record is kept among its staff and graduate students so far.

This January, the China-WHO joint mission made field trips to institutions including the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control, the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and visited biosafety laboratories and had in-depth and candid exchanges with experts there. Through these field trips and in-depth visits, members of the mission unanimously agreed that the allegation of lab leaking is extremely unlikely. Member of the joint mission Peter Daszak said during an interview with American media that they were able to have in-depth exchanges with authoritative experts in the Wuhan Institute of Virology with a level of openness even he hadn't anticipated, when the claim of lab leaking was politicized on a global scale. The experts went to every place they asked to see, and met everyone they wanted to meet. The visit has been a great success.

Meanwhile, I also want to point out that there are increasingly more reports on the virus and COVID-19 pandemic being spotted in various places around the world early in the second half of 2019, and that the international community is highly concerned about the questions around the biological lab at Fort Detrick and the real intentions of the US' establishment of 200-plus overseas bio-labs. What is the real purpose for the US to continue to play up the so-called "lab leak theory"? Does it really care about the origin-tracing of the virus or just want to divert attention? We hope that the relevant departments in the US will make a clarification and explain that to the world as soon as possible. We hope that relevant parties will follow China's example, take a scientific and cooperative attitude, work with the WHO on origin-tracing, and make positive contribution to the humanity's early victory over the pandemic and better capabilities in dealing with public health emergencies in the future.
...
Bloomberg: Could you confirm it all that three people from the Wuhan Institute of Virology became so sick in November 2019 that they did go to hospital? Are those details the facts?

Zhao Lijian: I just made clear the position of the Chinese side citing the statement released by the Wuhan Institute of Virology on March 23. As a matter of fact, the Wuhan Institute of Virology had not been exposed to Covid-19 before December 30, 2019, and a "zero-infection" record is kept among its staff and graduate students so far. Therefore, the report you mentioned that three people at the Wuhan Institute of Virology fell ill is totally untrue.
...
https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/t1878214.shtml
 
Source: https://www.theweek.in/news/health/...ne-is-back-in-focus-in-covid-origin-hunt.html

Amid Wuhan lab's denials, why a copper mine is back in focus in COVID origin hunt
In April 2012, 6 miners tasked with clearing bat excreta in the mine fell ill, 3 died
Web Desk May 25, 2021 10:24 IST

On Monday, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), one of China's premier virology research institutions, was back in the news after The Wall Street Journal reported that three researchers became ill with symptoms similar to COVID-19 in November 2019.

The report reignited the 'Wuhan lab leak' theory that claimed COVID-19 had leaked from the research institution. Not surprisingly, the Wuhan Institute of Virology has dismissed the reports.

Yuan Zhiming, director of the WIV's Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory told China's Global Times tabloid that The Wall Street Journal report was a "complete lie".

"Those claims are groundless. The lab has not been aware of this situation [sick researchers in autumn 2019], and I don't even know where such information came from," Yuan told the Global Times.

China has consistently denied reports linking the origin of COVID-19 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Abandoned mine back in focus

On Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported that one of its reporters was detained by police in China's Mojiang where he was questioned. The police deleted from the reporter's cellphone a photograph of an abandoned copper mine in Mojiang, which has been linked to the origins of COVID-19.

In April 2012, six miners tasked with clearing bat excreta in the mine fell ill with severe pneumonia and three of them subsequently died.

The incident at the Mojiang mine had ignited curiosity the world years before the pandemic began. Scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology visited the site to take samples of bats and identified multiple new coronavirus variants.

The Wall Street Journal reported that questions about the nature of the illness of the miners and research by the Wuhan Institute, in addition to China's continuing curbs on reporting from the Mojiang area, have "have elevated into the mainstream an idea once dismissed as a conspiracy theory: that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, might have leaked from a lab in Wuhan, the city where the first cases were found in December 2019".

The Wall Street Journal quoted material from academic theses in China to shed light on the nature of the illness experienced by the miners in 2012, which bear similarities to COVID-19. The Wall Street Journal noted one of the miners "had suffered from a fever and cough for two weeks... he had trouble breathing and had begun coughing up rust-color mucus spotted with blood. A CT scan revealed severe pneumonia, with the same lung markings now seen in many COVID-19 patients".

At the time, Chinese researchers suspected the cause of the illness was "a bat-borne SARS-like coronavirus". The Wall Street Journal reported Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers worked at the mine, taking samples from 276 bats. "Half of the samples tested positive for coronaviruses, including an unidentified strain of a SARS-like one, according to the scientists. They called the virus RaBtCoV/4991,” The Wall Street Journal reported...
 
https://usrtk.org/our-litigation/
USRTK v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
...

On Feb. 4, 2021, USRTK filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for violating provisions of FOIA. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, seeks documents and correspondence with or about China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and the EcoHealth Alliance, which partnered with and funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology, among other subjects.
USRTK v. U.S. Department of Education


U.S. Right to Know is suing the U.S. Department of Education for violating provisions of FOIA. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, seeks documents that the Education Department requested from the University of Texas’ Medical Branch at Galveston about its funding agreements and scientific and/or research cooperation with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.
USRTK v. U.S. Department of State


U.S. Right to Know is suing the U.S. State Department for violating provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This is the second FOIA lawsuit filed by USRTK as part of its efforts to uncover what is known about the origins of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2; the risks of biosafety labs; and gain-of-function research, which seeks to augment the infectivity or lethality of potential pandemic pathogens.
USRTK v. National Institutes of Health


U.S. Right to Know is suing the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for violating provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., seeks correspondence with or about organizations such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as the EcoHealth Alliance, which partnered with and funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
 
préalable :
par courtoisie : on doit laisser les états gérer leurs problèmes en famille .

Ce document n'a pas été cité :
https://www.oie.int/fr/new-internat...he-emergence-and-spread-of-zoonotic-diseases/

Les vétérinaires dépendant de l'O.M.C ont pour habitude de travailler avec les professionnels des fraudes. Les certificateurs se sont engagés à lutter aussi contre cela les fraudes.

En tout cas un état , comme les Etats Unis qui souhaite imposer son droit à tous ses partenaires , se doit de montrer ce que le respect du droit signifie quand la fraude est établie ...


Dans ce dossier il est établi que le Monsieur du président a fraudé . Le traitement de cette fraude est le préalable aux vraies discussions ...

preliminary:
out of courtesy: we must let the states manage their problems as a family.

This document was not cited:
https://www.oie.int/fr/new-internat...he-emergence-and-spread-of-zoonotic-diseases/

O.M.C dependent veterinarians are used to working with fraud professionals. The certifiers are also committed to fighting against this fraud.


In this case it is established that the President's gentleman cheated. The treatment of this fraud is the prerequisite for real discussions ...

In any case, a state, like the United States, which wishes to impose its law on all its partners, must show what respect for the law means when fraud is established ...
 
Phylogeny and Origins of Hantaviruses Harbored by Bats, Insectivores, and Rodents
  • Wen-Ping Guo ,
  • Xian-Dan Lin ,
  • Wen Wang ,
  • Jun-Hua Tian ,
  • Mei-Li Cong ,
  • Hai-Lin Zhang ,
  • Miao-Ruo Wang ,
  • Run-Hong Zhou,
  • Jian-Bo Wang,
  • Ming-Hui Li,
  • Jianguo Xu,
  • Edward C. Holmes,
  • Yong-Zhen Zhang
Abstract


Hantaviruses are among the most important zoonotic pathogens of humans and the subject of heightened global attention. Despite the importance of hantaviruses for public health, there is no consensus on their evolutionary history and especially the frequency of virus-host co-divergence versus cross-species virus transmission. Documenting the extent of hantavirus biodiversity, and particularly their range of mammalian hosts, is critical to resolving this issue.

Here, we describe four novel hantaviruses (Huangpi virus, Lianghe virus, Longquan virus, and Yakeshi virus) sampled from bats and shrews in China, and which are distinct from other known hantaviruses. Huangpi virus was found in Pipistrellus abramus, Lianghe virus in Anourosorex squamipes, Longquan virus in Rhinolophus affinis, Rhinolophus sinicus, and Rhinolophus monoceros, and Yakeshi virus in Sorex isodon, respectively. A phylogenetic analysis of the available diversity of hantaviruses reveals the existence of four phylogroups that infect a range of mammalian hosts, as well as the occurrence of ancient reassortment events between the phylogroups. Notably, the phylogenetic histories of the viruses are not always congruent with those of their hosts, suggesting that cross-species transmission has played a major role during hantavirus evolution and at all taxonomic levels, although we also noted some evidence for virus-host co-divergence.

Our phylogenetic analysis also suggests that hantaviruses might have first appeared in Chiroptera (bats) or Soricomorpha (moles and shrews), before emerging in rodent species. Overall, these data indicate that bats are likely to be important natural reservoir hosts of hantaviruses.

snip

Trapping of small animals and specimen collection


Bats were captured with mist nets or harp traps in caves of natural roosts in Zhejiang Province in the spring of 2011, or in villages or caves in Hubei Province in the spring of 2012 (Figure 1). According to protocols described previously [47], insectivore animals were trapped in cages using fried foods as bait in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2006 or in Yunnan Province in the autumns of 2010 and 2011. All animals kept were alive after capture. They were initially identified by morphological examination according to the criteria for bats described by Wang [48] and for insectivores by Chen [49], and further confirmed by sequence analysis of the mt-cyt b gene. All animals were anesthetized with ether before surgery, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Tissue samples of heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and brain were collected from bats and insectivores for detecting hantaviruses.

snip

A total of 450 bats of eight different species were captured in Longquan city and Wenzhou city, Zhejiang Province in the spring of 2011 (Figure 1 and Table 1). Similarly, 155 bats representing eight species were captured in Hubei Province in the spring of 2012. A total of 81 insectivores (representing two species – Anourosorex squamipes and Suncus murinus) were captured in Lianghe county, Yunnan Province in the spring of 2010 and autumn of 2011. In 2006, two shrews (from the species Sorex isodon and Suncus murinus) were collected from Yakeshi city, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.


more..



https://journals.plos.org/plospathog...l.ppat.1003159



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak – an update on the status
Military Medical Research volume 7, Article number: 11 (2020) Cite this article
  • 205k Accesses
  • 19 Citations
  • 238 Altmetric
  • Metrics
snip


Conclusions


The outbreak of COVID-19 swept across China rapidly and has spread to 85 countries/territories/areas outside of China as of 5 March 2020 [2]. Scientists have made progress in the characterization of the novel coronavirus and are working extensively on the therapies and vaccines against the virus. We have summarized the current knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 as follows: Firstly, the emerging pneumonia, COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, exhibits strong infectivity but less virulence, compared to SARS and MERS, in terms of morbidity and mortality. Originating from reservoir of bats and unknown intermediate hosts, SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 with high affinity as a virus receptor to infect humans. Secondly, the susceptible population involves the elderly and people with certain underlying medical conditions, which requires more attention and care. Thirdly, so far, the supporting treatments, combined with potent antiviral drugs, such as remdesivir, chloroquine, or lopinavir/ritonavir, have been conducted with definite effect on treat COVID-19 patients, while solid data from more clinical trials are needed. However, questions remain vague and more studies are urgent to explore the transmission and pathogenicity mechanism of the emerging coronavirus. To make clear the evolutionary path from the original host to cross-species transmission so as to potentially limit the transmission to na?ve animals or humans. In addition, to uncover the mystery of the molecular mechanism of viral entry and replication, which provides the basis of future research on developing targeted antiviral drugs and vaccines.

Given more than 80% of patients are confirmed in Hubei province, the hospitals and medical workers in Hubei are facing and bearing enormous pressure and severe challenge, including a high risk of infection and inadequate protection, as well as overwork, frustration and exhaustion [105]. Chinese Government and authorities have launched psychological intervention, and we sincerely hope that Chinese people and other countries overcome the epidemic as fast as possible.

https://mmrjournal.biomedcentral.com...79-020-00240-0

Bumping post #81 from earlier in the thread.
 
Facebook

An Update on Our Work to Keep People Informed and Limit Misinformation About COVID-19


April 16, 2020
By Guy Rosen, VP Integrity

Update on May 26, 2021 at 3:30PM PT:

In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured from our apps. We’re continuing to work with health experts to keep pace with the evolving nature of the pandemic and regularly update our policies as new facts and trends emerge.

...
https://about.fb.com/news/2020/04/covid-19-misinfo-update/#removing-more-false-claims
 
L'image de FB pourrait changer si cette entreprise mettait enfin en lumière les travaux collectifs , exemple :

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/冠状病毒

Dit autrement , si cette entreprise souhaite mettre en oeuvre un début de démarche qualité , mettre en lumière ce qui est en accès libre et de qualité me semble la base ...

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019冠状病毒病

Charge aux scientifiques de faire que les fiches mises en lumière soient représentatives du su.

Pour moi , vu la somme des sus , seules les formes wikifiés ont du sens ...

Les fiches informatives des états , ont elles à être promues par les états ...
 
Back
Top Bottom