• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

Anne

Senior Moderator
http://www.cdc.gov/eid/content/13/4/626.htm




Volume 13, Number 4?April 2007

Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

Nicolas Gaidet,* Tim Dodman,? Alexandre Caron,* Gilles Balan?a,* Stephanie Desvaux,* Flavie Goutard,* Giovanni Cattoli,? Fran?ois Lamarque,? Ward Hagemeijer,? and Fran?ois Monicat*
*Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le D?veloppement, Montpellier, France; ?Wetlands International, Wageningen, the Netherlands; ?Viale dell'Universit?, Legnaro, Italy; and ?Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Paris France
Suggested citation for this article
Abstract
We report the first large-scale surveillance of avian influenza viruses in water birds conducted in Africa. This study shows evidence of avian influenza viruses in wild birds, both Eurasian and Afro-tropical species, in several major wetlands of Africa.

<table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" width="150"> <tbody><tr> <td bgcolor="#d8eceb">
Figure
</td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#d8eceb">
06-1011_t.gif
</td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#d8eceb">Figure. Locations of sampling sites (or clusters of sites) in surveyed African countries (dark gray) initially participating in the Food and Agriculture Organization's Technical Cooperation Programs...
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> Wild water birds are considered to be the major natural reservoir for avian influenza viruses (AIV) (1). Large numbers of Eurasian breeding water birds overwinter in the sub-Saharan region of the African continent (2), where the survival of AIV is considered to be restricted by the tropical environment (3). Although the first reported isolation of AIV from wild birds (A/Tern/S.A./61 [H5N3]) was in Africa (4), a knowledge gap exists in the ecology of AIV in tropical regions (1,5). Whether AIV circulate in waterbird communities in Africa and whether tropical ecosystems can play a role in the perpetuation of AIV among waterfowl remain unknown. We report results from large-scale surveillance of water birds in 12 countries in Africa (Figure).
The Study

This surveillance program was implemented in early 2006 within the framework of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)'s Technical Cooperation Programs of Emergency Assistance for Early Detection and Prevention of Avian Influenza. Field sampling operations were coordinated by Centre de cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le D?veloppement and by Wetlands International, in partnership with wildlife and veterinary national services, international organizations<sup>1</sup>, local ornithologic nongovernment organizations, as well as national hunting associations and safari operators. Study species were selected among bird families recognized as major AIV reservoirs (notably among the orders Anseriformes and Charadriiformes), in both Eurasian and Afro-tropical bird communities. Study sites important for congregatory water birds were selected in accordance with national surveillance programs and field logistic constraints and included sites where palearctic and Afro-tropical birds mix.
From mid-January to early March 2006 (and early May in Tunisia), we collected cloacal swab samples from captured birds and from freshly killed birds provided by hunters. Samples of fresh droppings were also collected at roosting areas for gulls, terns, and some ducks. In Ethiopia, which has hunting restrictions, and in countries in which emergency surveillance operations were implemented after notification of influenza A (H5N1) outbreaks in Nigeria (Burkina Faso, Niger), special permits were obtained to shoot birds for sample collection (n = 732).
Materials used and storing procedures were standardized among field teams. The transport medium consisted of an isotonic phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.0?7.4, containing antimicrobial agents (penicillin 10,000 U/mL, streptomycin 10 mg/mL, amphotericin B 25 μg/mL, and gentamycin 250 μg/mL) supplemented with 10% glycerol. Samples were stored in liquid nitrogen containers or on ice and then stored at <?70?C after a few hours (generally <4 h, maximum of 24 h). They were shipped in dry ice in cryopacks until processed.
Samples were analyzed at the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (Italy), except for samples from Egypt that were analyzed at the US Naval Medical Research Unit-3 (Egypt), samples from Kenya and Malawi which were analyzed at the Agricultural Research Council Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute (RSA), and samples from Tunisia which were analyzed at the Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory (USA). The samples were all screened by real-time reverse transcription (RT)?PCR specific for type A influenza viruses (6), and positive samples were tested by RT-PCR specific for H5 subtype. All type A?positive samples were subsequently processed for virus isolation by using standard methods (inoculation into the allantoic cavity of 9- to 10-day-old embryonated specific-pathogen?free eggs, EU directive 92/40). Isolates were characterized by hemagglutination and neuraminidase-inhibition tests by using specific hyperimmune chicken antisera to the reference strains of influenza virus (7). Molecular pathogenicity of H5 subtype?positive samples was determined by sequencing the hemagglutinin gene segment (BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
A total of 4,553 birds (Table 1), consisting mostly of Afro-tropical and Eurasian ducks (32% and 31% of samples, respectively), were tested. The overall protion of AIV detected was 3.5% (n = 159 RT-PCR?positive samples, including both cloacal swabs and fresh droppings). Low-pathogenicity AIV were detected in 14 species of ducks, waders, gulls, terns, and rails, including both Eurasian and Afro-tropical species (Table 1). Positive samples were obtained from 8 countries (Chad, Ethiopia, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Senegal, and Tunisia). In the 2 most frequently sampled species, Eurasian ducks (garganey [Anas querquedula], n = 1,329) and Afro-tropical duck (white-faced whistling ducks [Dendrocygna viduata], n = 1,157), AIV were detected from most surveyed countries but with a highly variable prevalence (Table 2). Neither influenza A (H5N1) viruses nor any highly pathogenic AIV were detected. A total of 11 samples were positive for H5 subtype, mostly from garganey ducks (H5 prevalence of 0.7%). Finally, 5 low-pathogenicity AIV were isolated: 3 distinct isolates that originated from garganey ducks sampled in the Inner Niger Delta in Mali (H5N3, H11N9, H12N5) and 2 isolates that originated from white-faced whistling ducks sampled in Ethiopia (H8N4) and Senegal (H1N1).
Conclusions

The African continent, in particular its sub-Saharan region, constitutes a seasonal shelter for a large number of Eurasian water birds, including an estimated 5.4 million ducks that gather in western and eastern Africa during the northern winter (8). In their overwintering sites, these birds congregate and mix with a wide variety of Afro-tropical water birds, some of them with large populations widespread over Africa.
AIV have been isolated in wild ducks on wintering grounds in both Europe and North America (9,10). Results from this surveillance program established that AIV are also present in wild birds in Africa during the northern winter. Low-pathogenicity AIV were detected and isolated in several species from several major wetlands of northern, western, and eastern Africa, which indicates that environmental conditions in Afro-tropical ecosystems are favorable for the persistence and transmission of AIV.
We detected and isolated AIV in Eurasian and Afro-tropical species. This finding shows that AIV circulate in migratory water birds originating from Eurasia and in African species that remain in the continent throughout the year. Moreover, the detection of viruses in some Eurasian wader species during wintering (in January in Mali) and during migration (in May in Tunisia) contrasts with the apparent absence of AIV reported from previous studies of waders in Europe (5,11). Since waders form the most abundant group of African-Eurasian migratory water birds (12), these shorebirds may play a role in maintaining some AIV in waterbird communities at wintering and stopover sites.
The detection of AIV in Eurasian ducks in several of their major overwintering sites in West Africa (e.g., the Inner Niger Delta, the Senegal River Delta, and Lake Chad) supports the hypothesis that AIV can persist in wild duck populations year-round through a continuous circulation in a proportion of birds (1). Variability in the prevalence observed might be related to differences in local logistical constrains but also to differences between African regions in their waterbird assemblage and connectivity with European breeding grounds. The different isolates obtained from garganey from the Inner Niger Delta also indicate that various subtypes are circulating at the same time in a population, a finding that agrees with patterns observed in Europe and North America (11,13).
Various AIV subtypes were isolated from apparently healthy garganey and white-faced whistling ducks, which indicates that both Eurasian and Afro-tropical ducks may serve as reservoirs of AIV. These results not only suggest that some Eurasian ducks could carry AIV on their northward spring migration but also raise the possibility that AIV could persist in the tropical region and be disseminated over Africa through intra-African migratory ducks. The presence of AIV at African wintering and stopover sites, where birds from various geographic origins congregate and mix, provides opportunities for transmission of AIV between different populations and spread of AIV over extensive areas in both Eurasia and Africa.
Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the participation of and permissions granted by numerous national and local agencies in the participating countries. We are also grateful to the numerous ornithologists and veterinarians who collaborated in this surveillance program by collecting bird samples, as well as to the various laboratory teams who processed the samples (see a detailed list of partners in Gaidet and Dodman [14]). We also thank Akiko Kamata, Felix Njeumi, Arnaud LeMenach, Astrid Tripodi, and Vincent Martin for assistance in preparing and coordinating these campaigns; Catherine Cetre-Sossah for technical assistance; Camille Danes for her help in database management and illustration; and Vittorio Guberti for advice in the preparation of field operations.
This extensive survey has been coordinated by FAO through its Technical Cooperation Program and has been made possible by additional financial resources from the government of France.
Dr Gaidet is an ecologist in the Animal Production and Veterinary Department at the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development. His primary research interests include the host ecology of avian influenza and West Nile viruses.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

Another "no H5N1 in wild birds" study. Guess H5N1 isn't in Africa or North America.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

Qinghai H5N1 in Egypt in December, 2005

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&val=117395044

LOCUS EF042624 1596 bp cRNA linear VRL 15-NOV-2006
DEFINITION Influenza A virus (A/teal/Egypt/14051-NAMRU3/2005(H5N1))
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, partial cds.
ACCESSION EF042624
VERSION EF042624.1 GI:117395044
KEYWORDS .
SOURCE Influenza A virus (A/teal/Egypt/14051-NAMRU3/2005(H5N1))
ORGANISM Influenza A virus (A/teal/Egypt/14051-NAMRU3/2005(H5N1))
Viruses; ssRNA negative-strand viruses; Orthomyxoviridae;
Influenzavirus A.
REFERENCE 1 (bases 1 to 1596)
AUTHORS Saad,M.D., Gamal-Eldein,M.A., Ahmed,L.S., Yingst,S.L., Parker,M.A.
and Monteville,M.R.
TITLE Possible Introduction of Avian Influenza H5N1 in Egypt by a
Migratory Bird
JOURNAL Unpublished
REFERENCE 2 (bases 1 to 1596)
AUTHORS Saad,M.D., Gamal-Eldein,M.A., Ahmed,L.S., Yingst,S.L., Parker,M.A.
and Monteville,M.R.
TITLE Direct Submission
JOURNAL Submitted (04-OCT-2006) Viral and Zoonotic Diseases Research
Program, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Extension of
Ramses Street, Nasr City, Cairo 11517, Egypt
FEATURES Location/Qualifiers
source 1..1596
/organism="Influenza A virus
(A/teal/Egypt/14051-NAMRU3/2005(H5N1))"
/mol_type="viral cRNA"
/strain="A/teal/Egypt/14051-NAMRU3/2005"
/serotype="H5N1"
/isolation_source="cloacal swab"
/specific_host="teal duck"
/db_xref="taxon:409944"
/segment="4"
/country="Egypt: Damietta governorate"
/collection_date="Dec-2005"
gene <1..>1596
/gene="HA"
CDS <1..>1596
/gene="HA"
/codon_start=3
/product="hemagglutinin"
/protein_id="ABK34513.1"
/db_xref="GI:117395045"
/translation="YHANNSTEQVDTIMEKNVTVTHAQDILEKTHNGKLCDLDGVKPL
ILRDCSVAGWLLGNPMCDEFLNVPEWSYIVEKINPANDLCYPGNFNDYEELKHLLSRI
NHFEKIQIIPKSSWSDHEASSGVSSACPYQGRSSFFRNVVWLIKKDNAYPTIKRSYNN
TNQEDLLVLWGIHHPNDAAEQTRLYQNPTTYISVGTSTLNQRLVPKIATRSKVNGQSG
RMEFFWTILKPNDAINFESNGNFIAPENAYKIVKKGDSTIMKSELEYGNCNTKCQTPI
GAINSSMPFHNIHPLTIGECPKYVKSNRLVLATGLRNSPQGERRRKKRGLFGAIAGFI
EGGWQGMVDGWYGYHHSNEQGSGYAADKESTQKAIDGVTNKVNSIIDKMNTQFEAVGR
EFNNLERRIENLNKKMEDGFLDVWTYNAELLVLMENERTLDFHDSNVKNLYDKVRLQL
RDNAKELGNGCFEFYHRCDNECMESVRNGTYDYPQYSEEARLKREEISGVKLESIGTY
QILSIYSTVASSLALAIMVAGLS"


ORIGIN
1 gttaccatgc aaacaactcg acagagcagg ttgacacaat aatggaaaag aacgtcactg
61 ttacacacgc ccaagacata ctggaaaaga cacacaacgg gaaactctgc gatctagatg
121 gagtgaagcc tctaatttta agagattgta gtgtagctgg atggctcctc gggaacccaa
181 tgtgtgacga attcctcaat gtgccggaat ggtcttacat agtggagaag atcaatccag
241 ccaatgacct ctgttaccca gggaatttca acgactatga agaactgaaa cacctattga
301 gcagaataaa ccattttgag aaaattcaga tcatccccaa aagttcttgg tcagatcatg
361 aagcctcatc aggggtgagc tcagcatgtc cataccaggg aaggtcctcc ttttttagaa
421 atgtggtatg gcttatcaaa aaggacaatg crtacccaac aataaagaga agttacaata
481 ataccaacca agaagatctt ttggtactgt gggggattca ccatccaaat gatgcggcag
541 agcagacaag gctctatcaa aacccaacta cctatatttc cgttgggaca tcaacactaa
601 accagagatt agtaccaaaa atagctacta gatctaaggt aaacgggcaa agtggaagga
661 tggagttctt ttggacaatt ttaaaaccga atgatgcaat aaactttgag agtaatggaa
721 atttcattgc tccagaaaat gcatacaaaa ttgtcaagaa aggggactca acaattatga
781 aaagtgagtt ggaatatggt aactgcaaca ccaagtgtca aactccaata ggggcgataa
841 actctagtat gccattccac aacatccacc ctctcaccat cggggaatgc cccaaatatg
901 tgaaatcaaa cagattagtc cttgctactg ggctcagaaa cagccctcaa ggagagagaa
961 gaagaaaaaa gagaggacta tttggagcta tagcaggttt tatagaggga ggatggcagg
1021 gaatggtaga tggttggtat gggtaccacc atagcaacga gcaggggagt gggtacgctg
1081 cagacaaaga atccactcaa aaggcaatag atggagtcac caataaggtc aactcgatca
1141 ttgacaaaat gaacactcag tttgaggctg ttggaaggga atttaataac ttagaaagga
1201 gaatagaaaa tttaaacaag aagatggaag acggattcct agatgtctgg acttataatg
1261 ctgaacttct ggttctcatg gaaaatgaga gaactctaga ctttcatgac tcaaatgtca
1321 agaaccttta cgacaaggtc cgactacagc ttagggataa tgcaaaggag cttggtaacg
1381 gttgtttcga gttctatcac agatgtgata atgaatgtat ggaaagtgta agaaacggaa
1441 cgtatgacta cccgcagtat tcagaagaag caagattaaa aagagaggaa ataagtggag
1501 taaaattgga atcaatagga acttaccaaa tactgtcaat ttattcaaca gtggcgagct
1561 ccctagcact ggcaatcatg gtggctggtc tatctt
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

my summary:

no H5N1 or other HPAI were found in African water birds (n=4580)
in spring 2006.
3.47% of samples were positive for influenza, including H1N1,
H8N4,H12N5,H11N9,H5N3.
0.24% of samples were positive for H5-subtype.
1409 out of ~5.4 million Eurasian ducks were tested (0.026%).
No reason was given, why we only hear about this 1 year later.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

my summary:

no H5N1 or other HPAI were found in African water birds (n=4580)
in spring 2006.
3.47% of samples were positive for influenza, including H1N1,
H8N4,H12N5,H11N9,H5N3.
0.24% of samples were positive for H5-subtype.
1409 out of ~5.4 million Eurasian ducks were tested (0.026%).
No reason was given, why we only hear about this 1 year later.
The (non)data was presented almost a year ago in Italy.

http://www.recombinomics.com/phylo.html

FAO and OIE International Scientific Conference On Avia Influenza, Italy 2006

It was nonsense then and is nonsense now.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

thanks. It's here:
http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/subje...ards/conference/documents/Abstract_Gaidet.pdf

I also found this thread from 31.May 2006:

http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6671

why does it take so long that the paper is published ?
I think a better question is why the paper was published at all. Flooding the literature with negative data reflects much more on the investigators than the investigations.

No H5N1 in wild birds in Africa is utter nonsense, and the publication merely gives the false assurances more credibility, and also raises major credibility issues with the publisher and the sponsoring CDC.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

but... that's science !

You won't manipulate or withhold data, just because it's better
for potential investments.
You lose credibility, if you do.

No H5N1 _found_ in this study. They don't say there is(was) none.
But I conclude that it was very little
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

but... that's science !

You won't manipulate or withhold data, just because it's better
for potential investments.
You lose credibility, if you do.

No H5N1 _found_ in this study. They don't say there is(was) none.
But I conclude that it was very little
Please. They used an assay that had a low sensitivity. The conclusions were far from scientific. H5N1 is widespread in migratory birds in Africa and has been detected in Egypt, Sudan, Djibouti, Nigeria, Niger, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso, Cameroon.

Most readers of this board couldn't detected H5N1 either, but that doesn't really mean much.

The study was well into the garbage in / garbage out category.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

the signification for me is " no h5n1 at this place, at this time " ( you have the location on the map ) ...

if a biopsy is negative, that does not mean that there is no cancer.
but if it 's postive , you are sure there is a cancer.
so , it 's the same.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

the signification for me is " no h5n1 at this place, at this time " ( you have the location on the map ) ...

if a biopsy is negative, that does not mean that there is no cancer.
but if it 's postive , you are sure there is a cancer.
so , it 's the same.
Not really. The statement merely means H5N1 was not detected. The postive teal in Egypt initially tested negative. H5N1 was clearly there, but the assay was not very sensitive. So H5N1 WAS in EGYPT (and throught Africa) in DECEMBER, 2005, but was not reported in any country in Africa until February, 2006 (when it was easily detected in dead poultry).

The negative data is GROSSLY misleading and well into to "garbage" category.

As I said, most readers of this board couldn't detect H5N1 in Africa either, but most would publish their lack of competence.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

Here's a quick run-down. Although almost 5000 (4553) birds were sampled, virus was isolated from 5, indicating the samples were VERY poor or the isolation techniques were VERY poor.

The low isolation rate indicates the study was fatally flawed, and the negative data should have been put into the circular file.

The study was utter nonsense and its puiblication in a "peer reviewed" journal speaks volumes about the peers and the journal.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

most readers here couldn't detect other sorts of flu either,
still they found 159. Is other flu harder to detect than H5N1 ?

Well, when the disease kills the birds in a few weeks then they are
less likely to be caught by scientists.
But H5N1 in ducks is usually low-path , as I understand.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

most readers here couldn't detect other sorts of flu either,
still they found 159. Is other flu harder to detect than H5N1 ?

Well, when the disease kills the birds in a few weeks then they are
less likely to be caught by scientists.
But H5N1 in ducks is usually low-path , as I understand.
They isolated 5. The study was GARBAGE.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

hmm, in Europe in spring 2006 they sampled 60000 birds,
741 of which were H5N1-positive.
But they preferrably sampled suspicious birds, not just
any birds like in the African study.

When assuming the same quote for Africa, we would have expected 56
H5N1s in 4553 suspicious birds.

We could repeat the test doing throat swabs, but how big could the difference be ? They might find a few birds with H5N1 but presumably
still less than 10 , we won't expect 30% or such prevalence of any flu
in birds...

Or is there any reason to assume H5N1 behaves differently
from other flu wrt. to this throat-cloake testing ?
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

hmm, in Europe in spring 2006 they sampled 60000 birds,
741 of which were H5N1-positive.
But they preferrably sampled suspicious birds, not just
any birds like in the African study.

When assuming the same quote for Africa, we would have expected 56
H5N1s in 4553 suspicious birds.

We could repeat the test doing throat swabs, but how big could the difference be ? They might find a few birds with H5N1 but presumably
still less than 10 , we won't expect 30% or such prevalence of any flu
in birds...

Or is there any reason to assume H5N1 behaves differently
from other flu wrt. to this throat-cloake testing ?
The assays are confirmatory assays used to verify H5N1 in dead and dying poultry. These assays are VERY insensitive in general, while the assays in Africa were simply pure unadulterated GARBAGE.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

so, how many of these 4553 birds do you estimate actually
had undetected H5N1-viruses inside ?
how many do you estimate had any flu-A virus inside ?
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

so, how many of these 4553 birds do you estimate actually
had undetected H5N1-viruses inside ?
how many do you estimate had any flu-A virus inside ?
Avian influenza should be in the 20-50% range. There should have been over 1000 postives. Who knows how many would have H5N1. There haven't been any real studies, other than the propaganda pieces like the one cited here.
 
Re: Avian Influenza Viruses in Water Birds, Africa

right. 3.5% looks unusually small. It could be different in Africa,
due to hot weather.
I found this with googling for "percent of ducks" influenza:



---------------------------------------

April 2005: Vietnam
Initial testing showed that 71 percent of ducks and 21.4 percent of chickens in Vietnam's 11 southern localities in the Mekong Delta are infected with bird flu virus strain H5.

October 2005: Sweden
The board said the type of virus found in the dead duck was a mild, low pathogenic type of the H5 virus and added that at this time of year it is not unusual for 20-30 percent of ducks to carry influenza.

Febr.2006:
About 30 percent of ducks might be carrying some form of low pathogenic avian influenza, which doesn't hurt them

Sept.2006: Indonesia
60 percent of ducks had bird flu.

We know that about .15 percent of waterfowl sampled will actually have live virus and be symptomatic. That's really important because we know they can actually carry the virus.?



Dec.2006, Europe:
But experts contacted by the magazine said normally about 10 percent of ducks and 1 percent of geese have signs of ordinary avian flu in Europe in December.

2004,wet markets,Hongkong
Led by microbiologist Guan Yi from the University of Hong Kong,
researchers collected 51,121 fecal and other samples from
healthy-looking birds in live-poultry markets across seven provinces
in southern China from January 2004 to June 2005.
The H5N1 virus was found in 1.8 percent of ducks, 1.9 percent of
geese, 0.46 percent of minor poultry like pheasants and quail, and
0.26 percent of chickens.

October 2005,Indonesia:
Omi described the virus as "unpredictable, firmly entrenched and continuing to spread" and estimated that 30 percent of ducks in some locations are carriers.
 
Which End of a Duck to Swab:

Which End of a Duck to Swab:

Here's a section from one of the papers...
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no11/06-0652.htm

Susceptibility of North American Ducks and Gulls to H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza

Viruses

Justin D. Brown,* Comments to Author David E. Stallknecht,* Joan R. Beck,† David L.

Suarez,† and David E. Swayne†
*College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; and

†Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia, USA

Virus Isolation and Serologic Testing

The virus isolation results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Viral titers were higher in
oropharyngeal swabs than in cloacal swabs in all species and with both H5N1 viruses. Viral
titers on cloacal swabs were low, except from birds that died of AIV infection.
Oropharyngeal swabs from all species collected at 1 and 2 DPI were positive on virus
isolation. Wood ducks and laughing gulls had higher viral titers on oropharyngeal and
cloacal swabs and shed virus longer than any of the other species. Virus was isolated from
numerous organs in the wood ducks and laughing gulls that died.
And to make it even more clear, here's a quote from one of the authors...

Quote:
Stallknecht explained that in low-pathogenic avian influenza, most of the virus is shed in
the feces of birds. The virus then spreads as other birds drink from contaminated water.
The study found that in highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza, however, the birds shed
most of the virus through their respiratory tract.
Stallknecht said that with this knowledge, scientists can more effectively detect the virus
in live birds by swabbing the birds' mouths and throats.
"Doing avian influenza surveillance is pretty tricky because there are a lot of species
differences and there are also seasonal differences," he said. "So you've got to pick the
right species at the right time and you've got to collect the right samples.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top