Bird flu mutating to infect people more easily

[AlaskaDenise]

Re: Bird flu mutating to infect people more easily

So why was the current paper done? What does it add to our knowledge? What are the implications of this research, in practical terms?

J.

Upon reading the webconferences.com presentation, on page 40 there is an interesting chart on "Neutralizing antibodies to a virus with the 1918 virus HA & NA."

Perhaps some of our highly qualified members could comment on why (after many years of being nearly zero) those 1918 antibodies would rise after the 1957 H2N2, 1968 H3N2, and 1979 H1N1 mini-pandemics.

If someone can copy page 40
(http://www.webconferences.com/nihoba/ppt/Biosafety%20final%20Kawaoka.pdf),
it would be helpful.

.

[AlaskaDenise]

Re: Bird flu mutating to infect people more easily

By the by, the above research was also confirmation of previous studies conducted in the early 1990s

here's one from 1993.....

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=8445709&ordinalpos=15&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

.

[4-ABBA]

Re: Bird flu mutating to infect people more easily

Bird Flu Viruses Found In Africa And Europe 'Closest To Becoming A Human Virus'

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071004205327.htm

Science Daily ? Since it first appeared in Hong Kong in 1997, the H5N1 avian flu virus has been slowly evolving into a pathogen better equipped to infect humans. The final form of the virus, biomedical researchers fear, will be a highly pathogenic strain of influenza that spreads easily among humans.

Now, in a new study a team of researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison report the identification of a key step the virus must take to facilitate the easy transmission of the virus from person to person.

A team of researchers led by virologist Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the UW-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine has identified a single change in a viral protein that facilitates the virus' ability to infect the cells of the upper respiratory system in mammals. By adapting to the upper respiratory system, the virus is capable of infecting a wider range of cell types and is more easily spread, potentially setting the stage for a flu pandemic.

"The viruses that are in circulation now are much more mammalian-like than the ones circulating in 1997," says Kawaoka, an internationally recognized authority on influenza. "The viruses that are circulating in Africa and Europe are the ones closest to becoming a human virus."

As its name implies, bird flu first arises in chickens and other birds. Humans and other animals in close contact with the birds may be infected, and the virus begins to adapt to new host animals, a process that may take years as small changes accumulate. Over time, an avian virus may gather enough genetic change to spread easily, as experts believe was the case with the 1918 Spanish flu, an event that killed at least 30 million people worldwide.

In the new study, which was conducted in mice, the Wisconsin team identified a single change in a viral surface protein that enabled the H5N1 virus to settle into the upper respiratory system, which "may provide a platform for the adaptation of avian H5N1 viruses to humans and for efficient person-to-person virus transmission."

Other currently undetermined changes are required for the virus to become a human pathogen of pandemic proportions, Kawaoka explains, but establishing itself in the upper respiratory system is necessary as that enables easy transmission of the virus through coughing and sneezing.

To date, more than 250 H5N1 human infections worldwide have been reported. Of those, more than 150 have been fatal, but so far efficient human-to-human transmission has not occurred. Most infections have occurred as a result of humans being in close contact with birds such as chickens that have the virus.

According to Kawaoka, the avian virus can be at home in the lungs of humans and other mammals as the cells of the lower respiratory system have receptors that enable the virus to establish itself. Temperatures in the lungs are also higher and thus more amenable to the efficient growth of the virus.

The new study involved two different viruses isolated from a single patient -- one from the lungs, the other from the upper respiratory system. The virus from the upper respiratory system exhibited a single amino acid change in one of the key proteins for amplification of influenza virus genes.

The single change identified by the Wisconsin study, says Kawaoka, promotes better virus replication at lower temperatures, such as those found in the upper respiratory system, and in a wider range of cell types.

"This change is needed, but not sufficient," Kawaoka explains. "There are other viral factors needed to cause a viral pandemic" strain of bird flu.

However, Kawaoka and other flu researchers are convinced it is only a matter of time, as more humans and other animals are exposed to the virus, before H5N1 virus takes those steps and evolves into a virus capable of causing a pandemic.

This research is published Oct. 4, 2007 in the journal Public Library of Science Pathogens.

In addition to Kawaoka, authors of the new PLoS Pathogens study include Masato Hatta, Yasuko Hatta, Jin Hyun Kim, Shinji Watanabe of the UW-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine; Kyoko Shinya of Japan's Tottori University; Tung Nguyen of the Vietnamese National Centre for Veterinary Diagnostics; Phuong Song Lien of the Vietnam Veterinary Association; and Quynh Mai Le of the Vietnamese National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology.

The work was funded by grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Japan Science and Technology Agency.

Note: This story has been adapted from material provided by University of Wisconsin-Madison.

[AlaskaDenise]

Re: Bird flu mutating to infect people more easily

A hypothetical question here.....

Various PubMed papers have mentioned an upper "cutoff" temperature of 37-38C for influenza replication at "lower than avian" temperatures, as allowed by the PB2/627 (& possibly others) mutation.

Given the lack of antivirals for a large infected population, could we slow H5N1 replication by lowering the body temperature to below the lower limit of the replication temperature? Would the body's humoral immune system continue to work toward developing antibodies at those temperatures?

If the principle works for birds with a higher body temperature than H5N1 viruses with the PB2/627 changes, why shouldn't it work in the opposite direction?

I began by wondering if people with lower natural body temperatures (mine is usually 97.3 or lower) might be less like to get a severe case of regular flu if the virus replicates more slowly, allowing the immune system to prepare a defense faster than the virus can replicate.

from http://www.virologyj.com/content/3/1/58 .....

Human-tropic influenza viruses are considered to replicate in the upper respiratory tract at 33–37°C, while avian influenza viruses replicate in the gut around 41°C

33C=91.4F, 37C=98.6F, 41C=105.8F

.