Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Usability of daily SF36 questionnaires to capture the QALD variation experienced after vaccination with AS03A-adjuvanted monovalent influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in a safety and tolerability study

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Usability of daily SF36 questionnaires to capture the QALD variation experienced after vaccination with AS03A-adjuvanted monovalent influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in a safety and tolerability study

    Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 May 6;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1147-4.
    Usability of daily SF36 questionnaires to capture the QALD variation experienced after vaccination with AS03A-adjuvanted monovalent influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in a safety and tolerability study.

    Standaert B1, Dort T2,3, Linden J4, Madan A4, Bart S5, Chu L6, Hayney MS7, Kosinski M8, Kroll R9, Malak J10, Meier G11, Segall N12, Schuind A4.
    Author information

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    This study aims to describe the short-term reactogenicity of the AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine expressed through adverse events (AEs) and quality-adjusted life-day (QALD) scores. The AEs are likely to be short-term and therefore the quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, SF-36v2, was administered daily to record changes over seven days. A more sensitive application of this instrument should allow for a better understanding of short-term tolerability of adjuvanted vaccines.
    METHODS:

    Participants (N = 50) received a 2-dose vaccination schedule. Solicited (collected daily: days 0 to 7 [post dose 1] and 21 to 28 [post dose 2]) and unsolicited (collected weekly until day 21) AEs were collected via diary cards. The QoL questionnaires were completed daily (days 0-6) and weekly (days 0, 6, 21, 27) after dose one. Questionnaire data were transformed into SF-6D scores to report QALDs. It was hypothesized post-hoc that the QALD and daily AEs scores should correlate if discrete QoL-changes were captured.
    RESULTS:

    Pain (92%) and muscle ache (66%) were the most commonly reported solicited local and general AEs respectively, neither increased in intensity nor in frequency after dose 2. No safety concerns were identified during the study. A correlation between the daily AEs and QALD scores existed (correlation coefficient, - 0.97 (p < 0.001)). The impact of the AEs scores on the QALD was marginal (- 0.02 max for one day).
    CONCLUSION:

    Similarly with other H5N1 studies, no safety concern was identified throughout the study. Some time-limited variations in QALD-scores were reported. Our results imply that daily administration of the SF-36v2 captures changes in QALD-scores.
    TRIAL REGISTRATION:

    ClinicalTrials.gov . NCT01788228. Registered 11 February 2013.


    KEYWORDS:

    Adjuvanted vaccine; Avian influenza A; H5N1; Quality of life; Reactogenicity; SF-36v2 questionnaire

    PMID: 31060567 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1147-4
    Free full text
Working...
X