Tweet
Lancet Infect Dis
. 2026 Apr 2:S1473-3099(26)00062-9.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00062-9. Online ahead of print.
Immunogenicity of high-dose recombinant influenza vaccine versus standard-dose egg-grown and cell-grown vaccines among frequently and infrequently vaccinated young adults in Singapore: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, single-centre, phase 4 clinical trial
Sheena G Sullivan 1 , Xuan Ying Poh 2 , Stephany Sanchez-Ovando 3 , A Jessica Hadiprodjo 3 , Louise Carolan 4 , Yi Qing Chin 5 , Suma Rao 5 , Stephanie Sutjipto 6 , Joseph Lim 7 , Desiree Anthony 8 , Sapna P Sadarangani 9 , Ian G Barr 4 , Barnaby Young 10 , Annette Fox 11
Affiliations
Background: Egg-grown influenza vaccines can have low effectiveness against A(H3N2), especially among repeat vaccinees. Cell-grown and recombinant-haemagglutinin vaccines can overcome attenuation associated with egg-acquired adaptations, but it is uncertain whether they remain effective with repeated vaccination. Here, we aim to compare immune responses induced by egg-grown, cell-grown, and recombinant vaccines among frequent and infrequent vaccinees.
Methods: We conducted a randomised, controlled, single-centre, double-blind, phase 4 clinical trial to assess whether high-dose (45 μg of each antigen) recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV-R) are more immunogenic than standard-dose (15 μg of each antigen) egg-grown (QIV-E) and cell-grown (QIV-C) vaccines. Adults aged 21-49 years with no contraindications to vaccination and no immunocompromising conditions were enrolled at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore. Participants were stratified by the number of vaccines received in the preceding 5 years as infrequent (zero or one) and frequent (three or more) and randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of QIV-R, QIV-C, or QIV-E by intramuscular injection. Participants and outcome assessors were masked to group allocation until study completion. The primary outcome was geometric mean titre (GMT) against egg-grown and cell-grown A(H3N2) vaccine viruses at 14 days post-vaccination, estimated by linear regression adjusted for vaccination history and baseline titre and analysed in the per-protocol set. Safety data were collected and reviewed by the study team. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05479370) and is complete.
Findings: Between Oct 6, 2022, and March 31, 2023, we enrolled 366 adults. Pre-vaccination and post-vaccination serum pairs were available for 359 (n=120 QIV-R, n=119 QIV-C, n=120 QIV-E). Post-vaccination GMTs against cell-grown A(H3N2) were 2·9-fold higher (95% CI 2·2-3·8) following QIV-R (GMT 100, 95% CI 84-120) compared with QIV-C (35, 29-43; p<0·0001) or QIV-E (36, 29-43; p<0·0001). Adjusted GMTs were lower among frequent compared with infrequent vaccinees who received QIV-E (GMT 25, 95% CI 19-34 vs 50, 38-66) or QIV-C (24, 18-32 vs 53, 40-70) but were similar for frequent and infrequent vaccinees who received QIV-R (93, 70-120 vs 110, 84-150). Rates of adverse events were similar between QIV-E (three [3%] of 120), QIV-C (two [2%] of 119), and QIV-R (zero of 120).
Interpretation: QIV-R induced greater A(H3N2)-reactive antibody titres than QIV-E or QIV-C and was equally immunogenic among frequent and infrequent vaccinees. Further work is needed to ascertain whether this gain is sustained with QIV-R vaccination over multiple seasons.
. 2026 Apr 2:S1473-3099(26)00062-9.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00062-9. Online ahead of print.
Immunogenicity of high-dose recombinant influenza vaccine versus standard-dose egg-grown and cell-grown vaccines among frequently and infrequently vaccinated young adults in Singapore: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, single-centre, phase 4 clinical trial
Sheena G Sullivan 1 , Xuan Ying Poh 2 , Stephany Sanchez-Ovando 3 , A Jessica Hadiprodjo 3 , Louise Carolan 4 , Yi Qing Chin 5 , Suma Rao 5 , Stephanie Sutjipto 6 , Joseph Lim 7 , Desiree Anthony 8 , Sapna P Sadarangani 9 , Ian G Barr 4 , Barnaby Young 10 , Annette Fox 11
Affiliations
- PMID: 41936374
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(26)00062-9
Background: Egg-grown influenza vaccines can have low effectiveness against A(H3N2), especially among repeat vaccinees. Cell-grown and recombinant-haemagglutinin vaccines can overcome attenuation associated with egg-acquired adaptations, but it is uncertain whether they remain effective with repeated vaccination. Here, we aim to compare immune responses induced by egg-grown, cell-grown, and recombinant vaccines among frequent and infrequent vaccinees.
Methods: We conducted a randomised, controlled, single-centre, double-blind, phase 4 clinical trial to assess whether high-dose (45 μg of each antigen) recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIV-R) are more immunogenic than standard-dose (15 μg of each antigen) egg-grown (QIV-E) and cell-grown (QIV-C) vaccines. Adults aged 21-49 years with no contraindications to vaccination and no immunocompromising conditions were enrolled at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore. Participants were stratified by the number of vaccines received in the preceding 5 years as infrequent (zero or one) and frequent (three or more) and randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of QIV-R, QIV-C, or QIV-E by intramuscular injection. Participants and outcome assessors were masked to group allocation until study completion. The primary outcome was geometric mean titre (GMT) against egg-grown and cell-grown A(H3N2) vaccine viruses at 14 days post-vaccination, estimated by linear regression adjusted for vaccination history and baseline titre and analysed in the per-protocol set. Safety data were collected and reviewed by the study team. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05479370) and is complete.
Findings: Between Oct 6, 2022, and March 31, 2023, we enrolled 366 adults. Pre-vaccination and post-vaccination serum pairs were available for 359 (n=120 QIV-R, n=119 QIV-C, n=120 QIV-E). Post-vaccination GMTs against cell-grown A(H3N2) were 2·9-fold higher (95% CI 2·2-3·8) following QIV-R (GMT 100, 95% CI 84-120) compared with QIV-C (35, 29-43; p<0·0001) or QIV-E (36, 29-43; p<0·0001). Adjusted GMTs were lower among frequent compared with infrequent vaccinees who received QIV-E (GMT 25, 95% CI 19-34 vs 50, 38-66) or QIV-C (24, 18-32 vs 53, 40-70) but were similar for frequent and infrequent vaccinees who received QIV-R (93, 70-120 vs 110, 84-150). Rates of adverse events were similar between QIV-E (three [3%] of 120), QIV-C (two [2%] of 119), and QIV-R (zero of 120).
Interpretation: QIV-R induced greater A(H3N2)-reactive antibody titres than QIV-E or QIV-C and was equally immunogenic among frequent and infrequent vaccinees. Further work is needed to ascertain whether this gain is sustained with QIV-R vaccination over multiple seasons.