Tweet
Am J Infect Control
. 2020 Oct 8;S0196-6553(20)30899-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.003. Online ahead of print.
Operating room air delivery design to protect patient and surgical site results in particles released at surgical table having greater concentration along walls of the room than at the instrument tray
Jennifer A Wagner 1 , Franklin Dexter 2 , Damon G Greeley 3 , Kevin Schreiber 4
Affiliations
- PMID: 33039512
- PMCID: PMC7544698
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.003
Abstract
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, recommendations have included that personnel not involved in procedures releasing airborne contaminants reduce their exposure by moving >2 meters away. We tested whether air particle concentrations in operating rooms (ORs) are greater in the periphery, downstream from the supply airflow.
Methods: We analyzed data from 15 mock surgical procedures performed in 3 ORs. Two ORs were modern, one with a single large diffuser system above the surgical table, and the other using a multiple diffuser array design. An air particle counting unit was located on the instrument table, another adjacent to an air return grille.
Results: Concentrations of air particles were greater at return grille than instrument table for the single large diffuser at 26 air exchanges per hour, and the multiple diffuser array at both 26 and 20 air exchanges per hour (all P ≤ .0044), including during electrocautery (all P ≤ .0072). The ratios of concentrations, return grille versus instrument table, were greater during electrocautery for 0.5 to 1.0-micron particles and 1.0 to 5.0-micron particles (both P < .0001).
Conclusions: Modern OR airflow systems are so effective at protecting the surgical field and team from airborne particles emitted during surgery that concentrations of particles released at the OR table are greater at the OR walls than near the center of the room.
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Operating room management; airborne contaminants; operating room airflow.