J Nucl Med . Lung scintigraphy for pulmonary embolism diagnosis in COVID-19 patients: a multicenter study

[tetano]

J Nucl Med


. 2021 Oct 14;jnumed.121.262955.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262955. Online ahead of print.
Lung scintigraphy for pulmonary embolism diagnosis in COVID-19 patients: a multicenter study


Pierre-Yves Le Roux ¹ , Pierre-Benoit Bonnefoy ² , Achraf Bahloul ³ , Benoit Denizot ⁴ , Bertrand Barres ⁵ , Caroline Moreau-Triby ⁶ , Astrid Girma ⁷ , Amandine Pallardy ⁸ , Quentin Ceyrat ⁹ , Laure Sarda-Mantel ¹⁰ , Micheline Razzouk-Cadet ¹¹ , Reka Zsigmond ¹² , Cachin Florent ⁵ , Gilles Karcher ³ , Pierre-Yves Salaun ¹



Affiliations

• PMID: 34649944
• DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262955

Abstract

In patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) referred for lung scintigraphy for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), there has been an ongoing debate within the nuclear medicine community as to whether and when the ventilation study should be performed. Indeed, while PE diagnosis typically relies on the recognition of ventilation/perfusion (V/P) mismatched defects, the ventilation procedure potentially increases the risk of contamination to the healthcare workers. The primary aim of this study was to assess the role of ventilation imaging when performing lung scintigraphy for suspected PE in COVID-19 patients. The secondary aim was to describe practices and imaging findings in this specific population. Methods: A national registry was created in collaboration with the French Society of Nuclear Medicine to collect lung scans performed in COVID-19 patients for suspected PE. Practices of departments were assessed regarding imaging protocols and aerosol precautions. A retrospective review of V/P SPECT/CT scans was then conducted. Two physicians blinded to clinical information reviewed each case by sequentially using P SPECT, P SPECT/CT and V/P SPECT/CT images. Scans were classified in one of the four following categories: patients for whom PE could reasonably be excluded based on 1) perfusion SPECT only, 2) P SPECT/CT, 3) V/P SPECT/CT; or 4) patients with mismatched defects suggestive of PE according to the EANM criteria. Results: Data from 12 French nuclear medicine departments were collected. Lung scans were performed between 03/2020 and 04/2021. Personal protective equipment and dedicated cleaning procedures were used in all departments. Out of the 145 V/Q SPECT/CT included in the central review, PE could be excluded using only P SPECT, P SPECT/CT and V/P SPECT/CT in 27 (19%), 55 (38%) and 45 (31%) patients, respectively. V/P SPECT/CT was positive for PE in 18 (12%) patients, including 12 (67%) with a low burden of PE (≤10%). Conclusion: In this population of COVID-19 patients assessed with lung scintigraphy, PE could be confidently excluded without ventilation in only 57% of patients. Ventilation imaging was required to confidently rule out PE in 31% of patients. Overall, the prevalence of PE was low (12%).

Keywords: COVID-19; Respiratory; SPECT/CT; Vascular; pulmonary embolism; single photon emission computed tomography; ventilation perfusion scintigraphy.