I hope people take a deep breath and realize we've all been lied to. The premise for the mandates and thus the lockdowns including social distancing etc... were ALL based on false information propagated by Big Pharma. As you have now read and seen, an executive from Pfizer admitted to the EU Parliament recently that the "vaccine" was NEVER tested for stopping transmission. And now of course, we all know it doesn't stop transmission so it was never effective. And so many people are being injected and dying after vaccination, we also know it is not safe. So it is neither safe, nor effective. Please watch the videos below for more information.
Thankfully there are many new films and documentaries available to inform everyone.
Those who wish to hear will hear.
SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
DIED SUDDENLY: Number of High-Profile Deaths is Becoming Impossible to Ignore.
https://rumble.com/v1q1u1m-died-suddenly-official-trailer-streaming-november-21st.html
BROKEN TRUTH
https://rumble.com/v1q8p0w-broken-tr...roduction.html
UNINFORMED CONSENT
PART 1 https://www.bitchute.com/video/LXfYDPBSbx3Z/
PART 2 https://www.bitchute.com/video/Rc8NBzqw5FTg/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/akrCCTVPvDwo/ FULL DOCUMENTARY
THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI
PLANDEMIC SERIES 1 ,2, and 3
-
THE STEYN LINE / GBNEWS.UK
DID THEY LIE TO YOU?
Several countries are dropping the CoVid mandates and recommendations as Pfizer just made a huge admission.
Pfizer admits they "did everything at risk."
Meaning, there was no testing to see if the vaccine ever stopped transmission though they falsely claimed it did.
It's the first time an official from Pfizer admits they knew it wouldn't stop transmission.
*Translation: telling people to get vaccinated to protect your grandmother was pure fantasy. Purely spoken, this is disinformation from our governments around the world.
Leave a comment:
-
Dr. Aseem Malhotra: COVID JAB ‘HAS UNPRECEDENTED HARMS’
NHS trained Cardiologist, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, recently joined a growing body of scientists and doctors breaking free of the mainstream Covid narrative. After spending 9 months analyzing countless Covid-19 vaccine papers and studies, he presented comprehensive evidence supporting his call for Covid-19 vaccination to be suspended immediately.
#DrAseemMalhotra #WorldCouncilForHealth
POSTED: October 3, 2022
Leave a comment:
-
State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo Issues New mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance
Florida Department of Health sent this bulletin at 10/07/2022 06:12 PM EDThttps://content.govdelivery.com/acco...letins/3312697
October 7, 2022 State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo Issues New mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Today, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has announced new guidance regarding mRNA vaccines. The Florida Department of Health (Department) conducted an analysis through a self-controlled case series, which is a technique originally developed to evaluate vaccine safety.
This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group. Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks.
As such, the State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution when making this decision.
“Studying the safety and efficacy of any medications, including vaccines, is an important component of public health,” said Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. “Far less attention has been paid to safety and the concerns of many individuals have been dismissed – these are important findings that should be communicated to Floridians.”
The analysis can be found here. The guidance can be found here.Leave a comment:
-
Mörz, M. A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101651
Abstract
The current report presents the case of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination. The patient was first vaccinated in May 2021 with the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vector vaccine, followed by two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in July and December 2021. The family of the deceased requested an autopsy due to ambiguous clinical signs before death. PD was confirmed by post-mortem examinations. Furthermore, signs of aspiration pneumonia and systemic arteriosclerosis were evident. However, histopathological analyses of the brain uncovered previously unsuspected findings, including acute vasculitis (predominantly lymphocytic) as well as multifocal necrotizing encephalitis of unknown etiology with pronounced inflammation including glial and lymphocytic reaction. In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.
Keywords: COVID-19 vaccination, necrotizing encephalitis, myocarditis, detection of spike protein, detection of nucleocapsid protein, autopsyLeave a comment:
-
Covid-19 Injections in Pregnant Women Lead to 8X Increase in Spontaneous Abortions and 3X Increase in Stillbirths.
Medical establishment and government lied to pregnant women. The New England Journal of Medicine lied too, but professionally, with statistics.
Biden Administration following the guidance of the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations. -- countermeasures were rapidly developed that are not subject to the same laws governing medicines and vaccines. Associated with this effort under the pretext of public health has been a massive, relentless campaign to get the needle into every arm over the past 2 years, but the group hunted with conspicuous vigilance by the government-pharma cartel from the start were pregnant women, followed by children and babies. An avalanche of what this author deems unlawful direct to consumer ads screaming about tremendously “safe in pregnancy” Covid-19 shots started appearing on social media and other major platforms before these shots were even authorized for emergency use (December 2020). EUA does not permit advertising any drug as safe and effective. But the government is exempt from following laws, remember?
A side note for every over-zealous vaccinator out there: you were “following orders” from the HHS and coercing every pregnant woman in your care by lying about safety and efficacy of these injections. You were paid for lying to your patients, and you may have been promised a liability cover. You may still be held liable under state laws for not providing informed consent. Talk to your attorney.
Given the avalanche of “tremendously safe in pregnancy” messages out there, including from the top FDA and CDC officials, one may be surprised that as of today, these shots are officially not recommended in pregnancy according to the product labels, that state there is no data to make these recommendations.
--more
Leave a comment:
-
Steve Kirsch - Israeli Government, MoH BOMBSHELL - Covered Up Known Long-Term Vaccine Risks
Steve Kirsch joins us to discuss proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID injections then deliberately covered it up, with leaked footage out of a Ministry of Health (MoH) meeting where a panel of experts presented their findings. Following this meeting, a cover-up ensued - and we have the proof.
You can follow Steve's work via his Substack:
Leave a comment:
-
‘Unethical’ and up to 98 Times Worse Than the Disease: Top Scientists Publish Paradigm-Shifting Study About COVID-19 Vaccines
A team of nine experts from Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and other top universities has published paradigm-shifting research about the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and why mandating vaccines for college students is unethical.
This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.
The paper is co-authored by Dr. Stefan Baral, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University; surgeon Martin Adel Makary, M.D., a professor at Johns Hopkins known for his books exposing medical malfeasance, including “Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won’t Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Heath Care”; and Dr. Vinay Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist, who is a professor in the UCSF Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, as well as the author of over 350 academic and peer-reviewed articles.
But among this team of high-profile international experts who authored this paper, perhaps the most notable is Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D., current Director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, and professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Keshavjee has also worked extensively with Partners In Health, a Boston-based non-profit co-founded by the late Dr. Paul Farmer, on treating drug-resistant tuberculosis, according to his online biography.Risking Disenrollment
As the study pointed out, students at universities in America, Canada, and Mexico are being told they must have a third dose of the vaccines against COVID-19 or be disenrolled. Unvaccinated high school students who are just starting college are also being told the COVID-19 vaccines are “mandatory” for attendance.
These mandates are widespread. There are currently 15 states which continue to honor philosophical (personal belief) exemptions, and 44 states and Washington, D.C. allow religious exemptions to vaccines. But even in these states, private universities are telling parents they will not accept state-recognized vaccine exemptions.
Based on personal interviews with some half a dozen families, The Epoch Times has learned that administrators at some colleges and universities are informing students that they have their own university-employed medical teams to scrutinize the medical exemptions submitted by students and signed by private doctors. These doctors, families are being told, will decide whether the health reasons given are medically valid.5 Ethical Arguments Against Mandated Boosters
Though rarely reported on in the mainstream media, COVID-19 vaccine boosters have been generating a lot of controversy.
While some countries are quietly compensating people for devastating vaccine injuries, and other countries are limiting COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, the United States is now recommending children 12 and older get Pfizer-BioNTech’s Omicron-specific booster, and young adults over the age of 18 get Moderna’s updated shot.
At the same time, public health authorities in Canada are suggesting Canadians will need COVID-19 vaccines every 90 days.
Against a backdrop of confusing and often changing public health recommendations and booster fatigue, the authors of this new paper argue that university booster mandates are unethical. They give five specific reasons for this bold claim:
1) Lack of policymaking transparency. The scientists pointed out that no formal and scientifically rigorous risk-benefit analysis of whether boosters are helpful in preventing severe infections and hospitalizations exists for young adults.
2) Expected harm. A look at the currently available data shows that mandates will result in what the authors call a “net expected harm” to young people. This expected harm will exceed the potential benefit from the boosters.
3) Lack of efficacy. The vaccines have not effectively prevented transmission of COVID-19. Given how poorly they work—the authors call this “modest and transient effectiveness”—the expected harms caused by the boosters likely outweigh any benefits to public health.
4) No recourse for vaccine-injured young adults. Forcing vaccination as a prerequisite to attend college is especially problematic because young people injured by these vaccines will likely not be able to receive compensation for these injuries.
5) Harm to society. Mandates, the authors insisted, ostracize unvaccinated young adults, excluding them from education and university employment opportunities. Coerced vaccination entails “major infringements to free choice of occupation and freedom of association,” the scientists wrote, especially when “mandates are not supported by compelling public health justification.”
The consequences of non-compliance include being unenrolled, losing internet privileges, losing access to the gym and other athletic facilities, and being kicked out of campus housing, among other things. These punitive approaches, according to the authors, have resulted in unnecessary psychosocial stress, reputation damage, loss of income, and fear of being deported, to name just a few.22,000 to 30,000 Previously Unaffected Young Adults Must be Vaccinated to Prevent Just 1 Hospitalization
The lack of effectiveness of the vaccines is a major concern to these researchers. Based on their analysis of the public data provided to the CDC, they estimated that between 22,000 and 30,000 previously uninfected young adults would need to be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent just a single hospitalization.
However, this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by a previous infection. So, the authors insisted, “this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit.”
In other words, the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 are essentially useless.Mandated Booster Shots Cause More Harm Than Good
But the documented lack of efficacy is only part of the problem. The researchers further found that per every one COVID-19 hospitalization prevented in young adults who had not previously been infected with COVID-19, the data show that 18 to 98 “serious adverse events” will be caused by the vaccinations themselves.
These events include up to three times as many booster-associated myocarditis in young men than hospitalizations prevented, and as many as 3,234 cases of other side effects so serious that they interfere with normal daily activities.
At a regional hospital in South Carolina, the desk clerk sported a button that read: “I’m Vaccinated Against COVID-19” with a big black check mark on it.
“What about the boosters?” a hospital visitor asked. “It’s starting to seem like we need too many shots.”
“It does seem like a lot,” the clerk agreed. “It’s hard to know what to do.” But she did have some advice for the visitor: “Just keep reading and educating yourself, so you can make an informed decision.”
This new paper is essential reading for anyone trying to decide if they need more vaccines. The authors concluded their study with a call to action. Policymakers must stop mandates for young adults immediately, be sure that those who have already been injured by these vaccines are compensated for the suffering caused by mandates, and openly conduct and share the results of risk-benefit analyses of the vaccines for various age groups.
These measures are necessary, the authors argued, to “begin what will be a long process of rebuilding trust in public health.”May the Force Be With Brave Scientists
The two co-first authors, Dr. Kevin Bardosh and Allison Krug, both thanked their families for supporting them to “publicly debate Covid-19 vaccine mandates” in the acknowledgments section of the paper.
As we wrote in May, an increasing number of scientists and medical doctors are speaking out about the dubious efficacy and disturbing safety issues surrounding these fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccines. They do so fully aware of the personal and professional risks involved. They deserve our encouragement and support.
Leave a comment:
-
1323 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 900 Dead, After COVID Injection
It is definitely not normal for so many mainly young athletes to suffer from cardiac arrests or to die while playing their sport, but this year it is happening. Many of these heart issues and deaths come shortly after they got a COVID vaccine. While it is possible this can happen to people who did not get a COVID vaccine, the sheer numbers clearly point to the only obvious cause.
It wasn’t intentional, but at one point there were ominous numbers in the headline. 2 to the 10th power and 666 dead athletes.
The so-called health professionals running the COVID vaccine programs around the world keep repeating that “the COVID vaccine is a normal vaccine and it is safe and effective.”
-- more
Leave a comment:
-
Pfizer Used Dangerous Assumptions, Rather than Research, to Guess at Outcomes
August 1, 2022 • by Robert W. Chandler, M.D., M.B.A. - Team 5
At the launch of widespread mass inoculation of the public with Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, BNT162b2, media, physicians’ spokespeople, and government officials communicated widely that the injected drug would be retained at the injection site muscle tissue and in local lymph nodes. The components were supposed to be metabolized in a day or so, leaving only induced SARS CoV-2 Spike antigen to evoke a therapeutic immune response. A short pulse of drug effect would be followed, they claimed, by limited production of Spike antigen.
However, newly released internal Pfizer documents show that this is not true. In fact, the injection causes widespread distribution of the material in tissues and this distribution persists for at least two days, and probably much longer. These facts are the exact opposite of what was publicized.
A cluster of FDA-released Pfizer documents — “Final Report: A Tissue Distribution Study of a [3H]-Labelled Lipid Nanoparticle-mRNA Formulation Containing ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 Following Intramuscular Administration in Wistar Han Rats”[https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl...223_185350.pdf], 2.4 NONCLINICAL OVERVIEW [https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl...l-overview.pdf], “MODULE 2.6.5. PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY”
[https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl...ed-summary.pdf] and the heavily redacted report “R&D STUDY REPORT No. R-20-0072 – EXPRESSION OF LUCIFERASE-ENCODING MODERNA AFTER I.M. APPLICATION OF GMPREADY ACUITAS LIPID NANOPARTICLE FORMULATION “[https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl..._R-20-0072.pdf] — all examine tissue distribution of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine BNT162b2. These documents will be addressed in this report.
Leave a comment:
-
Source: https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Data Shows a Negative Benefit to Harm Ratio in New Peer-Reviewed Paper
An important new paper was published on Wednesday (Aug. 31) in volume 40, issue 35 of the peer-reviewed Vaccine journal, with an impact score of 4.1, and an acceptance rate of 32%.
One of the authors of the paper is Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate editor of the British Medical Journal. A little over a month ago, he put his name to a pre-print of the paper, which journalist Phil Harper reported on, suggesting it would never find its way through peer review, and yet here we are.
Put simply, both the Moderna and the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial data appeared to have a negative benefit/harm ratio. Below is one of the key findings from the paper.
"In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants).
In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants)."
Quick jargon translation: AESI = adverse event of special interest. Or in other words: serious adverse events which we should be paying very close attention to.
Serious Adverse Events are defined as “death; life-threatening at the time of the event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; medically important event, based on medical judgment.”
To find this data, investigators used four months of trial data submitted to regulators before the COVID-19 vaccines were put on the market. They gathered the data from journals, and data published by both Health Canada and the FDA. They created a blinded table of serious adverse events recorded in each trial and then had blinded investigators go through that table and determine if those serious adverse events were actually “AESIs”, defined above.
It’s important to be clear about what the findings of the paper suggest; trial data showed that mRNA vaccines appear to have a negative benefit/harm ratio.
Other key findings from the paper:
👉 There was a 16% higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients than in placebo recipients.
👉 There was a 43% higher risk of serious adverse events of special interest in mRNA vaccine recipients.
👉 mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization.
👉 Authors call for a formal risk-benefit analysis of the mRNA vaccines to take place.
👉 The authors suggest that we’ll need trial participant data in order to complete this task
👉Authors encourage third-party replication of their study, with access to complete SAE case narratives.
👉 The risks may be substantially less in some groups compared to others. Thus, knowing the actual demographics of those who experienced an increase in serious AESI in the vaccine group is necessary for a proper harm-benefit analysis.
For how much longer can the "safe and effective" mantra continue to exist?
Leave a comment:
-
This is a detailed 70 page report with imagery from microscopy.
The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis
The COVID-19 vaccination programmes must be stopped immediately
The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis has made its initial findings publicly available in a wide-ranging report:
1. Toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines - without exception.
2. The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes.
3. The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects.
1. In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that:
- are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines,
- had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines,
- are for the most part metallic,
- are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes,
- can only partially be explained as a result of crystallisation or decomposition processes,
- cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.
2. The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed.
3. The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, toxic.
The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. The group consists of independent scientists, including physicians, physicists, chemists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and alternative health practitioners, supported by lawyers, psychologists, analysts and journalists. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis uses modern medical and physical measuring techniques, the results of which have confirmed and complemented each other: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), Mass Spectroscopy (MS), Inductively Coupled Plasma Analysis (ICP), Bright Field Microscopy (BFM), Dark Field Microscopy (DFM) and Live Blood Image Diagnostics, as well as analysis of images using Artificial Intelligence. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis continues to work in close cooperation with several international groups that are carrying out similar investigations and who have obtained results consistent with our own. The results from our analysis of the vaccines can, consequently, be regarded as cross-validated. There are questions that need to be satisfactorily answered by the vaccine manufacturers and, in Germany, by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (the agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health responsible for the regulation of vaccines in that country). Possible causal links between the vaccines and fatalities need to be investigated.
In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the COVID-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately.
The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis Contact: agimpfstoffeaufklaerung@protonmail.com
more..Leave a comment:
-
Pfizer Used Dangerous Assumptions, Rather than Research, to Guess at Outcomes
August 1, 2022 • by Robert W. Chandler, M.D., M.B.A. - Team 5
At the launch of widespread mass inoculation of the public with Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, BNT162b2, media, physicians’ spokespeople, and government officials communicated widely that the injected drug would be retained at the injection site muscle tissue and in local lymph nodes. The components were supposed to be metabolized in a day or so, leaving only induced SARS CoV-2 Spike antigen to evoke a therapeutic immune response. A short pulse of drug effect would be followed, they claimed, by limited production of Spike antigen.
However, newly released internal Pfizer documents show that this is not true. In fact, the injection causes widespread distribution of the material in tissues and this distribution persists for at least two days, and probably much longer. These facts are the exact opposite of what was publicized.
A cluster of FDA-released Pfizer documents — “Final Report: A Tissue Distribution Study of a [3H]-Labelled Lipid Nanoparticle-mRNA Formulation Containing ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 Following Intramuscular Administration in Wistar Han Rats”[https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl...223_185350.pdf], 2.4 NONCLINICAL OVERVIEW [https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl...l-overview.pdf], “MODULE 2.6.5. PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY”
[https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl...ed-summary.pdf] and the heavily redacted report “R&D STUDY REPORT No. R-20-0072 – EXPRESSION OF LUCIFERASE-ENCODING MODERNA AFTER I.M. APPLICATION OF GMPREADY ACUITAS LIPID NANOPARTICLE FORMULATION “[https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/upl..._R-20-0072.pdf] — all examine tissue distribution of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine BNT162b2. These documents will be addressed in this report.
Pfizer Study 185350,” Final Report: A Tissue Distribution Study of a [3H]-Labelled Lipid Nanoparticle-mRNA Formulation Containing ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 Following Intramuscular Administration in Wistar Han Rat”, is one of 21 preclinical Prizer studies involving mice, rats and rhesus macaque non-human primates. Study No. 185350 (Sponsor Reference ALC-NC-0552) was summarized in Pfizer’s “2.4 Nonclinical Overview” and was separately published as a Final Report dated September 24, 2020.
-more
Leave a comment:
-
Shocking: UK Government Admits COVID Vaccinated Children Are 4423% More Likely to Die of Any Cause & 13,633% More Likely to Die of COVID-19 Than Unvaccinated Children
The UK Government has quietly confirmed that the Covid-19 vaccines are killing children at an unprecedented rate.
Shocking figures contained in an official report, published just hours before Boris Johnson announced his resignation as Prime Minister of the UK, reveal Covid-19 vaccinated children are 4423%/45x more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children and 13,6333/137x more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated children.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: