Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Peter Sandman & Jody Lannard - Comments

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Peter Sandman & Jody Lannard - Comments

    we need more phases than 6. I would like WHO to tell us,
    whether we are closer to 3.1,3.2,...,3.8,3.9
    or what they consider the likelyhood that we will be
    (at least) at 4
    by -say- spring or summer 2007.

    But WHO is not trying to be very open and informative here.
    In contrary, I get the feeling that they avoid to talk
    about this. WHO doesn't say how likely they consider
    a pandemic and the phases are not used to ahow this
    very well. Of, course, the higher the phase, the more likely
    -we would expect- they consider a pandemic.
    But besides that there is little information. It could go from
    3 directly to 6.
    They could delay going to 4 for political
    or funding reasons.
    I'm interested in expert panflu damage estimates
    my current links: http://bit.ly/hFI7H ILI-charts: http://bit.ly/CcRgT

  • #2
    Re: Peter Sandman & Jody Lannard - Comments

    but that means, that they don't judge on the biological/epidemiological
    necessities alone. That further reduces credibility on WHO
    and in the phases.
    I'm interested in expert panflu damage estimates
    my current links: http://bit.ly/hFI7H ILI-charts: http://bit.ly/CcRgT

    Comment

    Working...
    X