new H5N1 sequences from India, February 2006. (2.5 years ago !)
A/chicken/Jalgaon/12419/2006(H5N1)
A/chicken/Jalgaon/13732/2006(H5N1)
A/chicken/Jalgaon/13735/2006(H5N1)
full genomes, but some parts are missing and the first part of PB2 and last
part of PA look strange. (or recombination ?, I haven't examined this yet)
But even if we exclude the strange parts, the viruses have much more mutations than
other Qinghai viruses from that time.
e.g. A/Cat/Germany/606/11-03-2006(H5N1) has 5,3,4,4,2,1,3,2 promille difference to
the supposed original Qinghai virus from Feb.2005 while A/Ck/Jalgaon/12419/18-02-2006(H5N1)
has 10,9,14,9,6,4,6,8 promille in the 8 segments.
Closest relatives are the other sequences from India, NIV33491, also Feb.2006
but still 9,6,7,6,4,2,8,6 promille difference.
-----edit1--------
Qinghai-mutations-list updated at
graphics: http://magictour.free.fr/panflu/qin3wq.GIF
--------edit2----------
no suitable donor-sequences found for the "strange parts" in PB2 and PA,
so I assume it's somehow sequencing errors, which makes the whole sequences
a bit suspectable with all their other (unexpectedly many) mutations
A/chicken/Jalgaon/12419/2006(H5N1)
A/chicken/Jalgaon/13732/2006(H5N1)
A/chicken/Jalgaon/13735/2006(H5N1)
full genomes, but some parts are missing and the first part of PB2 and last
part of PA look strange. (or recombination ?, I haven't examined this yet)
But even if we exclude the strange parts, the viruses have much more mutations than
other Qinghai viruses from that time.
e.g. A/Cat/Germany/606/11-03-2006(H5N1) has 5,3,4,4,2,1,3,2 promille difference to
the supposed original Qinghai virus from Feb.2005 while A/Ck/Jalgaon/12419/18-02-2006(H5N1)
has 10,9,14,9,6,4,6,8 promille in the 8 segments.
Closest relatives are the other sequences from India, NIV33491, also Feb.2006
but still 9,6,7,6,4,2,8,6 promille difference.
-----edit1--------
Qinghai-mutations-list updated at
graphics: http://magictour.free.fr/panflu/qin3wq.GIF
--------edit2----------
no suitable donor-sequences found for the "strange parts" in PB2 and PA,
so I assume it's somehow sequencing errors, which makes the whole sequences
a bit suspectable with all their other (unexpectedly many) mutations