Re: Sequences at Genbank!
I checked all the WRAIR sequences.
It seems that they are less reliable than other sequences.
Additional mutations show up, which are unlikely to be real -
why should WRAIR have more mutations than others ?
wrair2.gif
wraivrdl.gif
one of the low-mutation Canada sequences:
paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... 016087.pdf
ahh, identical to this one from May, also in the other segments,
looks like they confused their sequences
--------------------------
and one of the Czech with few mutations:
those 2 Czech viruses are similar to viruses from 2009,
which were completely replaced in 2010/11 by a new strain (from India ?)
So this looks like a date-error by the Czech lab or a contamination
with an old sample from 2009
-------------------
wrair2.gif - earlier pic: May 24 , 2011
I checked all the WRAIR sequences.
It seems that they are less reliable than other sequences.
Additional mutations show up, which are unlikely to be real -
why should WRAIR have more mutations than others ?
wrair2.gif
wraivrdl.gif
one of the low-mutation Canada sequences:
paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... 016087.pdf
ahh, identical to this one from May, also in the other segments,
looks like they confused their sequences
--------------------------
and one of the Czech with few mutations:
those 2 Czech viruses are similar to viruses from 2009,
which were completely replaced in 2010/11 by a new strain (from India ?)
So this looks like a date-error by the Czech lab or a contamination
with an old sample from 2009
-------------------
wrair2.gif - earlier pic: May 24 , 2011
Comment