Check out the FAQ,Terms of Service & Disclaimers by clicking the
link. Please register
to be able to post. By viewing this site you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Acknowledge our Disclaimers.
FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster.
The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website.
By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.
There is another theory that could explain the phenomenom.
We know that viri held in deep freeze in artic and antarctic ice are still - sometimes - viable when released from deep freeze.
It is entirely possible that birds or other vectors have transported viruses to areas where subzero temperatures predominate, and that, with global warming and ice melts such viruses are released again into the environment.
Thus a virus from 1978 (or prior) could have become locked in ice, and then become released as warming has resulted in ice melts with a subsequent exposure to a viable host, restarting the cycle.
To test such a theory, where exactly were viral samples that matched earlier (unchanged) samples identified? Was it in a cold temperature area? Could it explain what has been seen in genetic sequence samples?
Just to add to the mix...
Please provide reference for viable virus isolated from ice.
a good example is also
A/Guangxi/50/2005(H5N1) {gx50} which has only 49 differences
in 3 years to A/Henan/16/2004.
gx50 can be viewn as the best matching anchestor-virus to current
H5N1 in most segments.
These slow evolutions with few mutations are rare and not seen
in human flu AFAIK with the exception of 1977 H1N1.
In the Qinghai strain we have one (and only one) other such example :
the Hungary-Suffolk virus. It suggests an abiotic reservoir,
or some place inside the bodies, where the virus can survive for
some time without mutating/replication.
Could this be the key why the virus is so successful in
SE-Asia ? What could be the reservoir where the virus
survives without mutating ? Why is this obviously useful
feature so rare in influenza ?
the 168 differences in PB2 between the Qinghai virus and the 1959-virus
is already so low, that Qinghai might be a direct descendant of 1959.
But some of the other differences are even much lower, so that
we should assume either errors or slow evolution, which is unusual.
The HK/75 virus had already given some examples of slow evolution
above in this thread
But it's not just this one virus. Close to HK75 in PB2 are e.g.
A/Dk/HK/24/76(H4N2)
A/Dk/HK/562/79(H10N9)
A/Dk/HK/312/78(H5N3)
they are pretty much "in a line". No room for a lab-error,
the "error" can't know the required mutations.
This would all be not so surprising , if the date-differences
would match the mutations-differences But :
there are 25 years between 2) and 3), with
only 26 differences !!
now it seems that we can observe the same phenomenon
in North America. More and more sequences are being uploaded
and virus-segments with few differences but decades apart
appear.
I have not yet made a systematic list as above for
HK-Hubei-Henan but e.g.
A/pintail/Alaska/779/2005(H3N8)
seems to have some low-distance relatives from the 70s
or 80s in all segments.
While at the same time being close to other viruses from 2005.
segment 1 : 97.4% similarity for 14 years
segment 2 : 97.5% similarity for 12 years
segment 3 : 95.9% similarity for 26 years
segment 4 : 97.1% similarity for 27 years
segment 5 : 96.6% similarity for 24 years
segment 6 : 96.3% similarity for 28 years
segment 7 : 98.3% similarity for 27 years
segment 8 : 97.4% similarity for 26 years
these are different viruses for the segments, there
was apparantly much reassortment.
---------edit1----------
comparing 52 North American avian viruses from the 70s with
248 North American avian viruses from 2000 or later
Code:
1978-2005: 39,29,40,28,28,32,16,15
compare with Asia from post #1:
Code:
1977-2004: 29,11,17,81,13,99,14,19
minimum:
Code:
27 years: 29,11,17,28,13,32,14,15
(nucleotide-difference in 0/00)
This low-mutation evolution isn't seen in human influenza
and seems to be independent and rarer than "normal"
evolution in birds. But it contributes significantly,
so is the current H5N1 a result of this low mutation evolution
in most segments since the 70s as shown above.
What could it be ? And why isn't it in human flu ?
(but some examples for swine too !)
some possible explanations:
* the virus could persist most of the time in the environment (water ?)
and only some of the time actively replicating in birds
* the virus could persist in some special organs/places inside
some special species of birds (or other animals ?)
* the virus has a method to replicate more reliably with fewer
mutation-rates in some species under certain circumstances
(as seen with influenza-B in humans)
* some gene-configurations are particularly stable and although
the mutation rate isn't lower, only few of them survive due
to selection (including selection for synonymous mutations)
I wish more bird-sequences from the 1970s from EurAsia
Question - we know influenza virus can remain viable for an indefinite time in ice, and we are in a period of global warming and ice melts. Is it possible that viral reservoirs are being freed from ice during melts at the same time as possible hosts are around for wider dissemination, re-introducing older viral forms back into the mix?
we have no evidence for this. flu has never been isolated from ice
in nature, AFAIK.
When you say: "indefinite time" then there should also be older
viruses around, 100 years or such, but that has never happened before,
AFAIK.
Also the samples from 1918 in permafrost were only small fragments,
hard to reconstruct. And they had to search a lot until they found
a body with some fragments.
maybe frozen droppings or frozen eggs or frozen bird-cadavers ?
Maybe some birds find and eat these frozen eggs, cadavers.
OK for Alaska, but in Hong Kong ??
We have a lot new bird sequences from USA and Alaska recently
shovelers,pintails,mallards, sandpiper
maybe I can make a more complete analysis when ******
stays calm
Comment