Front Public Health . Comparison of the methods for isolation and detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in municipal wastewater

[tetano]

Front Public Health


. 2023 Mar 7;11:1116636.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116636. eCollection 2023.
Comparison of the methods for isolation and detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in municipal wastewater


Vincent Lucansky ¹ , Marek Samec ² , Tatiana Burjanivova ³ , Eva Lukacova ³ , Zuzana Kolkova ¹ , Veronika Holubekova ¹ , Eva Turyova ³ , Andrea Hornakova ¹ , Tibor Zaborsky ⁴ , Petar Podlesniy ⁵ , Lenka Reizigova ⁶ , Zuzana Dankova ⁷ , Elena Novakova ⁸ , Renata Pecova ² , Andrea Calkovska ⁹ , Erika Halasova ¹



Affiliations

• PMID: 36960362
• PMCID: PMC10028190
• DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116636

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a causative agent responsible for the current global pandemic situation known as COVID-19. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 include a wide range of symptoms from mild (i.e., cough, fever, dyspnea) to severe pneumonia-like respiratory symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 has been demonstrated to be detectable in the stool of COVID-19 patients. Waste-based epidemiology (WBE) has been shown as a promising approach for early detection and monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in the local population performed via collection, isolation, and detection of viral pathogens from environmental sources.
Methods: In order to select the optimal protocol for monitoring the COVID-19 epidemiological situation in region Turiec, Slovakia, we (1) compared methods for SARS-CoV-2 separation and isolation, including virus precipitation by polyethylene glycol (PEG), virus purification via ultrafiltration (Vivaspin^®) and subsequent isolation by NucleoSpin RNA Virus kit (Macherey-Nagel), and direct isolation from wastewater (Zymo Environ Water RNA Kit); (2) evaluated the impact of water freezing on SARS- CoV-2 separation, isolation, and detection; (3) evaluated the role of wastewater filtration on virus stability; and (4) determined appropriate methods including reverse transcription-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) (targeting the same genes, i.e., RdRp and gene E) for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater samples.
Results: (1) Usage of Zymo Environ Water RNA Kit provided superior quality of isolated RNA in comparison with both ultracentrifugation and PEG precipitation. (2) Freezing of wastewater samples significantly reduces the RNA yield. (3) Filtering is counterproductive when Zymo Environ Water RNA Kit is used. (4) According to the specificity and sensitivity, the RT-ddPCR outperforms RT-qPCR.
Discussion: The results of our study suggest that WBE is a valuable early warning alert and represents a non-invasive approach to monitor viral pathogens, thus protects public health on a regional and national level. In addition, we have shown that the sensitivity of testing the samples with a nearer detection limit can be improved by selecting the appropriate combination of enrichment, isolation, and detection methods.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; WBE; droplet digital PCR (ddPCR); real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR); wastewater.